User talk:Elifanta23

July 2023

Hi Elifanta23! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Manakpur several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Battle of Manakpur, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Editors must not strike other editors comments in a discussion except when they are a proven sock puppet or otherwise banned from the discussion by administrator action.. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I did not see your reply to that ip user and it was a prompt action by me instead of reading further. I am OK with your revert. Elifanta23 (talk) 11:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Elifanta23!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Abecedare (talk) 21:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elifanta23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see that I have been blocked as sock puppet. This is wrong report. I am not sock of any HaughtonBrit. Please have the people who check accounts to confirm that I am not a sock. Please someone take a look at my account and unblock me from being a sock puppet. Elifanta23 (talk) 12:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. Please address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HaughtonBrit/Archive. Yamla (talk) 12:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@GeneralNotability: I found you in checkuser list. I have been blocked. This is wrong block. Can you please run investigation on my account with that of HaughtonBrit to confirm to administrator whether I am sock or not. Please help with this.Elifanta23 (talk) 12:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC) @Izno: found you in the list if GeneralNotability is not available. Help is needed to confirm I am not sock puppet. Elifanta23 (talk) 12:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elifanta23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

after reviewing HaughonBrit archive, allegation on me was that “newly made account exhibiting very similar editing patterns as Ralx888 by following CanadianSingh1469 around.” I have no idea what to make of this allegation. I do not understand what editing patterns is being talked about here. I didn’t follow CanadianSingh1469 but saw an article Battle of Manakpur and saw a tag on the top of the page which marked it for deletion and clicked on discussion to share my opinion. I read HaughtonBrit’s archive in detail and it shows him as someone from America in state Pennsylvania but I am from Europe, Belgium. This is misunderstanding of some sort where I have been associated with a sock account. This is why I would like checkuser to investigate please and unblock me as my account has been blocked because of misunderstanding.Elifanta23 (talk) 14:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have reviewed the evidence thoroughly and agree with Abecedare's conclusion that you are probably HaughtonBrit, and definitely not here to edit constructively. There is no way that this is your first time editing Wikipedia. If you plan to submit an unblock request, please explain what previous accounts you have edited under—or if you have edited only as an IP and do not wish to disclose the IP addresses, you can appeal to the Arbitration Committee. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 02:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla I have again submitted unblock request addressing the allegation. Seems some sort of misunderstanding. Please help.Elifanta23 (talk) 14:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]