Jump to content

User talk:Elilawson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for Image:Rhonda-CD-Artwork Small.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhonda-CD-Artwork Small.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rhonda-CD-Artwork Small.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhonda-CD-Artwork Small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Burzmali 15:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Rhonda Henderson, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rhondahenderson.com/bio.html. As a copyright violation, Rhonda Henderson appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Rhonda Henderson has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Rhonda Henderson and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Rhonda Henderson with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Rhonda Henderson.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. — ERcheck (talk) 05:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC) o[reply]

File:John Offerdahl 2008.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Offerdahl 2008.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 21:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Presley Lawson for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Presley Lawson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presley Lawson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete

[edit]

I do not see a reason to delete. Elilawson (talk) 04:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]