User talk:Eloisekirn

Your submission at Articles for creation: David H Kirn (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.4dmoleculartherapeutics.com/publications/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:David H Kirn may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Racer-Ωmegα 08:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Eloisekirn, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Racer-Ωmegα 08:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David V. Schaffer (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

He is clearly notable, but this is like a CV or faculty web page. Reduce the awards to the most important ones--and removing grants, which we do not include, say what are his most cited paper sand give the statistics from Google Scholar or elsewhere, link the article properly to the articles for the schools, and remove the links within the article to things for which we do not have articles.

And find some external references to his work. Then resubmit. I don't like to turn down an AfC for fixable matters, but I see no reason to do your work for you.

I assume you have a conflict of interest, because your username here is Eloisekirn and the name of the co-founder is David Kirn. And I see you have written a draft on him also. Please see your user talk for an explanation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David V. Schaffer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Eloisekirn, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 22:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David H Kirn has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David H Kirn. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 22:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

I call your attention to our rules oonflict of interest, WP:COI. Wikipedia strongly discourages articles about you, your relatives, or your company. The only acceptable way of adding material when one has a conflict of interest is too use WP:AFC. It is not acceptable to immediately resubmit the article without fixing the problem. A plain list of article may of may not be a copyright problem, but once the article has been deleted as such, you should use some judment in resubmitting it.

If you have a conflict of interest, and especially if there is a financial relationship, you must disclose this. See our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure. That your username is a partial match to the unusual last name of the cofounder of the company is not sufficient disclosure.

Second, with respect to the article content of these two articles. We do not want a full list of articles, and we do not want no list and all. Rather, we want a list of the 3 or 4 most important articles, usually as judged by the citation figures for Web of Science or Google Scholar. I realise it may be confusing for you to have been given advice in opposite directions, but the middle way is the way to do it.

It is also absolutely necessary that you use references from third-party independent reliable sources for awards. Basing everything on the firm's web page is not adequate.

Go fix both of them, and let me know when you are ready to check them . DGG ( talk ) 22:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 22:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David V. Schaffer (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Altenmann was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David V. Schaffer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- üser:Altenmann >t 03:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Eloisekirn, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - üser:Altenmann >t 03:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David V. Schaffer (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David V. Schaffer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 00:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David V. Schaffer (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David V. Schaffer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David H. Kirn has been accepted

David H. Kirn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've accepted the article after performing a cleanup. Please avoid editing the article yourself if you're in any way related to the subject. Instead, use the article's talk page top request edits, or head over to Wikipedia:Requested edits. Thank you, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:David V. Schaffer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:David V. Schaffer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David V. Schaffer

Hello, Eloisekirn. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "David V. Schaffer".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]