User talk:Emmaandafrica

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Emmaandafrica, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Yngvadottir (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I reverted your changes to Indecline because they weren't neutral and they were based on your personal point of view rather than what has been written in reliable sources. As an encyclopedia, we try to present just the facts and what others have said about them. However, I also think you were working on the wrong article. The concern about exploitation is already mentioned with references at the Bumfights article; have a look there and see what you think. If you consider the coverage of the issue there inadequate, you might want to start a new section on the associated talk page, Talk:Bumfights (I mistyped that in my edit summary). Do you have any more references that are not used in that article? Yngvadottir (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at Bumfights, see whether the references you are using are already present there, and if not, consider adding to that article. It's out of scope at Indecline, and the judgement as to whether they are real anarchists is POV unsupported by a reference. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at WikiLeaks, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please dont remove RS content because you disagree Softlemonades (talk) 19:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at WikiLeaks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop adding claims to the lead that are not supported by the citations and unrelated to surrounding text. 2010 and 2011 leaks are not relevant to criticism about 2015 and 2016 leaks. The lead is supposed to summarise the most important part of an article. Pages like MOS:LEAD WP:LEADCREATE WP:BETTER#Lead_section and WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY may help Softlemonades (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]