User talk:Encise

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Encise, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Glad to see my advice helped, and you voted in your first AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of prominent MySpace members. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask. AmiDaniel (Talk) 03:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your kind advice and message AmiDaniel. I want to "have a go" at all wiki-actions (voting, editing, cleaning, expanding stubs etc) prior to creating new articles, so your advice has really helped! Encise 03:45, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"So where the bloody..." AfD[edit]

Even as I voted keep, I readily concede that you are, to an extent, correct that some of us have overlooked the article's content in an effort to defend certain Wikipedia policies, viz., that Wikipedia is not censored for minors; I think as to the article itself, the question is a close one, but I think you are to be commended for alerting us to the fact that, irrespective of our views as to the reasons for which the article was nominated for deletion, we should still vote "delete" if the article is unencyclopedic (e.g., because the subject is non-notable). Because (for me) it's a very close case, I maintain that "keep" is appropriate (the article can always be renominated if notability is later questioned or the article isn't improved consistent with WP quality standards), but you raise a fine point. Joe 02:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frankston North[edit]

Hi there - thanks for adding all that stuff to the Frankston North article. Unfortunately none of it has any references, if you could provide that information that would be great.. Thanks --Commking 11:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - you've made the article much more interesting. Well done again. --Commking 00:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My god - you have been busy. Good work! --Commking 23:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kananook, Victoria[edit]

Simply that the article, is or was, uncategorised. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. I normally place the {{uncat}} at the top of the article, this time I must have been distracted when I placed it. Grey Shadow | Talk 13:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

I added some links 2 your page Fattdoggy 13:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cassette single[edit]

Hi there, I reverted your duplication of information from the Compact Cassette article to Cassette single; I didn't understand the rationale behind it going here.

The "main article" comments normally appear when a sub'-topic which it is useful to briefly summise in the main article has a more detailed article of its own (usu. because including it all would bloat out the parent). That doesn't apply here.

Fourohfour 17:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Dog[edit]

The Tim Dog's article doesn't need these info in the article it self. They are about his albums and all these info's were moved to where they should be put. Visit his album articles and all these info's are put out there. I mean why to have a tracklisting in the main article and not the album? Flesh-n-Bone 17:40, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WAYN[edit]

If you have problem with this article just simply correct it instead of marking POV... Pkuczynski (talk) 08:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In your comments you have suggested that it is written as the advertisement. You don't have to be social networks expert to fix the tone of the article. Let me know which part in your opinion looks like advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkuczynski (talk • contribs) 10:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sound Unlimited[edit]

I have nominated Sound Unlimited, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Unlimited. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jmlk 1 7 08:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AGF... but hey. Jmlk 1 7 05:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Beat Dis - The Very Best of Bomb The Bass[edit]

A tag has been placed on Beat Dis - The Very Best of Bomb The Bass requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jmlk 1 7 20:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Learn to calm down before you come to my talk page. Jmlk 1 7 04:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Street Sounds (Record Label) again[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Street_Sounds_(record_label)_(2nd_nomination)
Subject is notable, but the article is hopeless.

The contemporary name for the label was generally StreetSounds (one word)
There is little of relevance on the page aside from the ridiculously long discography
What is on the page is mainly blatant advertising, marketing and promotion, and links to more promotional material
Rather than rewrite the article, I have created another [here]

Your thoughts would be appreciated. Centrepull (talk) 13:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Encise! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,093 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Tina Thomsen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2×2 (album) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2×2 (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2×2 (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

versacespace leave a message! 14:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dance House and Club Anthems[edit]

The article Dance House and Club Anthems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, lack of notability, was unable to find any reliable sources to incorporate about any of the entries in the series

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 18:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]