User talk:Enlightenment1685

Hello

Úgy látom, küldtél nekem egy emailt. Sajnos nem kaptam meg. Szerintem használd a Talk page-emet a levelezéshez. Üdv, Borsoka (talk) 04:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Szia. Bocsi, csak most láttam hogy válaszoltál. Forrásokat szeretnék kérni, amikre korábban egy talk page-en hivatkoztál Benwing nevű usernek. (2013-szept-19) Azt írtad, hogy a nyugati kutatók elkerülik románok eredete témát (Schramm 1997). Feltételezem itt "Schramm - Korai román történelem" c. munkájára hivatkozol, ugye? A kommented további részében van 1 másik hivatkozás is, amikről nem találok adatot: "Fiedler 2008" Tudnál bővebb infót adni róla? (Kutató teljes neve, és a mű címe?) Illetve egy harmadik dolog, amit te nem említettél, de remélem, hogy talán tudsz benne segitení. Az orosz őskrónikában (Nesztor-krónika) szereplő vlachokat sok nem-román történész a keleti-frankokkal azonosítja, akiket a magyarok a Honfoglalás során kiűztek a Dunántúlról (Müller 1997, Petrukhin-Rejevszkij 2004, Sverdlov 1993, Likhacev-Tvorogov 2012) Évekkel ezelőtt olvastam egy fúrumon, hogy volt olyan nyugati angol, vagy amerikai történész is, aki szintén a keleti frankokkal azonosította a műben szereplő vlachokat. Sajnos többre nem emlékszem. Nem tudod véletlenül hogy ki lehet? Köszönöm előre is! Enlightenment1685 (talk) 05:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Balázs Sudár moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Balázs Sudár. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. The article is based on his professional CV and bibliography available on the internet, I have provided them at the bottom of the article, both available in pdf format. I didn't see the point in referring to them separately in the text, but now I placed the source references. All information in the article can be verified. I hope that's okay now. Enlightenment1685 (talk) 11:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio notice

I added a copyvio template on the content you added at Yugra. It appears to be a direct translation of Balázs Sudár's book, which is not in public domain. See Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Translating. Regardless of this, I found Sudár's argument illuminating, and I would be happy to see it readded in a form that does not violate copyright. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, you're probably right. The book is freely available on the author's research group website, so I thought it could be used without any problems, especially since it was published in another language. What to do in this case? Can I correct and re-add the article by rephrasing the text? Or do we have to wait for the administrator's decision first? Enlightenment1685 (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author can choose to distribute copies without it affecting the copyright status. In the article the copyvio template cannot be removed since the text has to be removed also from the article history by an admin. Other than that, I don't see any problem with re-adding the content in your own words even before the copyvio is addressed.

. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 08:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Balázs Sudár (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Balázs Sudár and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enlightenment1685! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you tell me exactly why you rejected the article? It is about a living person, whose professional CV was the basis of the article. The professional CV is available online and is attached at the bottom of the article. Sources and references are provided. What else is needed? I assume that you don't speak Hungarian, but you can check all the statements in the article with Google Translate. Enlightenment1685 (talk) 02:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Balázs Sudár (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability. Source #1 and #3 are WP:PRIMARY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Balázs Sudár and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 12:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Balázs Sudár

Hello, Enlightenment1685. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Balázs Sudár, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]