User talk:Erwan huelgoat
Welcome!
Hello, Erwan huelgoat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rugby union in Curaçao, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JamesBWatson (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Rugby union in Curaçao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Rugby union in Curaçao for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby union in Curaçao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby union in Curaçao until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 04:27, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Ways to improve Stade Brestois New York (formerly Stade breton)
[edit]Hi, I'm Ana Bykova. Erwan huelgoat, thanks for creating Stade Brestois New York (formerly Stade breton)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for making a wiki page, it looks great. Please refer to the tags added to find out how you could improve it. Best wishes,
Anastasia Bykova (talk) 22:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Breton soccer teams
[edit]Yes. Go into the History tab for the article and go to the version you like. Print that out, then go chronologically in order BACKWARDS from the most recent edit and press the "Undo" tag, writing in your justification of each revert in the subject line that will pop up. Was the vandalism done by anonymous IPs or by editors with user names? If the former, I could get the article semi-blocked after looking over this.--Aichik (talk) 19:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey, you're doing it wrong. You can't just delete everything inbetween and give them all the same comments. If there were edits in between August and now that were good you can't erase them if they're valid. That's why I suggested you print out the version you want so you can manually edit what you think needs to be changed. Wikipedia articles are always changing, you cannot just WILL them to be static. thanks--Aichik (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
License tagging for File:ACTIV Logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ACTIV Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ACTIV Financial
[edit]Hello Erwan huelgoat,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ACTIV Financial for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Geohakkeri (talk) 12:07, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ACTIV Financial
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ACTIV Financial requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 09:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.
|
See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 21:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)