User talk:Ethra2016

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

December 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Catholic Monarchs. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 18:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Catholic Monarchs[edit]

@Clpo13:It is oficial, historical, and accepted by historians that Spain was united in 1516 by Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor. Kings and Queens of both Crown of Aragon and Crown of Castile had married before, without uniting its realms, its laws and institutions being very different (Totalitarian Monarchy and Shared Monarchy). When Isabella died, the heir to the Crown of Castile was Juana la Loca, and her own father Fernando II of Aragon accused of madness (Loca means mad) to become Regent of the Crown of Castile as the same time as the Crown of Aragon, but the word Spain and union is never even mentioned during his reigns. When Ferdinand II died, his grandson Charles V finally was accepted by all the courts as rightfull heir to both crowns, being the first to unite them under one fisicall person.Ethra2016 (talk) 22:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Angry editing[edit]

When it is "too important" to stay calm, you probably shouldn't edit. I've reverted your change of his name to the less-known version, because it *is* less well-known and so unrecognizable. You've actually obscured something you are proud of!

I've then added the wikilink as you had because I thought that correct. Shenme (talk) 02:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

References

  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Warning[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:56, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Warning[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)