User talk:Etz254
October 2010[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Poitou-Charentes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Poitou-Charentes has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.1227.com.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chopper Read, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. William Avery (talk) 10:31, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)