User talk:Everythingmatters

Welcome!

Hi Everythingmatters! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Firefangledfeathers (talk) 00:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert - BLP

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi Everythingmatters! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Chris Cuomo that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 06:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bill Clinton sexual assault and misconduct allegations, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You have been told numerous times in edit summaries that the National Enquirer is not a reliable source. Notfrompedro (talk) 23:28, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bill Clinton, you may be blocked from editing. The NYT article never mentions nepotism and the NPR article clearly states "legal question in that case wasn't actually about the anti-nepotism statute." You can't draw your own conclusions from articles that either don't say that (in the former) or say the exact opposite (in the latter.) Notfrompedro (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seeing these messages?

Hi Everythingmatters! You have been around for a couple of weeks now, but have not responded to any messages on this user talk page, nor have you ever edited any talk pages. Communication with other editors is part of the process here. There's a lot to learn as a new editor, and I'd be happy to help if you have any questions. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:45, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited

Hello! Everythingmatters, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Sidney Blumenthal. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:19, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 05:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See ANI report (permalink). Johnuniq (talk) 05:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Everythingmatters. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 03:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]