User talk:Expert Master

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mark Boron per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mark Boron. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Expert Master (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept do collaborative edits and talk on the talk page, Please Unlock Me, if I made a mistake, making mistakes is human and I'm really sorry, I accept colaborate with politics and respect politics of Wikipedia, I'm new here, and only now I understand the rules and I want to respect Expert Master (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I accept do collaborative edits and talk on the talk page, Please Unlock Me, if I made a mistake, making mistakes is human and I'm really sorry, I accept colaborate with politics and respect politics of Wikipedia, I'm new here, and only now I understand the rules and I want to respect (Expert Master (talk) 14:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC))@Dreamy Jazz:[reply]

This is incoherent and doesn't address your sockpuppetry. Please sign in to your original account and address your violations there. --Yamla (talk) 14:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Expert Master (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, wow why was I blocked? I have access to the same address but I'm not the same person ok?

I just edited it on the talk page only.

calm down ok? what did I do wrong?Expert Master (talk) 22:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Similarities are obvious; clear socking going on. only (talk) 23:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I do not believe that you are a different user. There are too many similarities. Reviewing administrators can look at the edits on the talk page or ask me via email / on my talk if you would like me to list similarities for your review. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 23:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be sincere, I don't know how to use the wikipedia, my husband created an account for me. He told me that he was blocked and that he was not happy with the way he was treated here, so I decided to get into the discussion, but I did nothing wrong. what is my fault for that? I no can edit? Do you want a picture of me and my husband to identify? that's why I don't understand the reason of block, you have to give me a good reason why i've been blocked. If I knew that wikipedia worked like this, I would never have asked he to make an account. (Expert Master (talk) 01:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Expert Master (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll be sincere, I am Brazilian girl resident in Portugal I am married my Portuguese husband and we moved to Portugal due to the pandemic situation in Brazil, He it does not influence my edits any of that, but as I am Brazilian I was interested in a content and I decided to discuss, I did not offend anyone nor I did nothing wrong as you can see, my objective and debate on the subjects and not edit. I don't know how to use the wikipedia, my husband created an account for me. He told me that he was blocked and that he was not happy with the way he was treated here, so I decided to get into the discussion, but I did nothing wrong. what is my fault for that? I no can edit? Do you want a picture of me and my husband to identify? that's why I don't understand the reason of block, you have to give me a good reason why i've been blocked. If I knew that wikipedia worked like this, I would never have asked he to make an account for meExpert Master (talk) 15:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you describe is called meatpuppetry, which we treat as sockpuppetry. We have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer operating an account(whether it is you or your husband), so we must treat the two accounts as if they are operated by the same person. The reasons for the block are given on this page. 331dot (talk) 10:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.