User talk:FIang Xdot repasent aa

May 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Be Best seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 05:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to White House Rose Garden. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 08:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Meticulo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Adelaide have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Meticulo (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FIang Xdot repasent aa, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi FIang Xdot repasent aa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Victor Harbor, South Australia, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Victor Harbor, South Australia was changed by FIang Xdot repasent aa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862899 on 2021-05-16T06:35:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FIang Xdot repasent aa. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Djungelskog[edit]

Hello, FIang Xdot repasent aa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Djungelskog, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]