User talk:FKnight Al Makhalifi

September 2023

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Awlad Muhammad while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing.
If these logged out edits were not made by you, then please be mindful not to repeat someone else's edits once they have been reverted. In those situations, you should discuss changes to the article on the talk page instead. R Prazeres (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Frexes-Fraichiche horse 1893.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Frexes-Fraichiche horse 1893.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Laribus.png

Thanks for uploading File:Laribus.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antalas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kusaila, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle Of Marta (547), you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a mistake, i interpreted the fact Antalas migrated to the south after the battle of Sufetula before the battle of Marta and then joined Carcasan after the battle of Marta for invading Byzacena and Carthage, as Antalas joined Carcasan during the battle of Marta. I understood the mistake i have done. FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antalas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kingdom and Rex.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Frexes Kingdom of Dorsale Vandalic era.png

Thanks for uploading File:Frexes Kingdom of Dorsale Vandalic era.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vandalic War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confederacy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thala, Tunisia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confederacy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Antalas, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. I have reverted your edits to the lead of the article. The main problem was that it was unreadable, because it consisted of run-on sentences with faulty or convoluted grammar, and the point of it was unclear. Also, please don't include a plethora of links to the French wiki. Drmies (talk) 20:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Antalas, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Antalas. Disruptive editing, edit warring Drmies (talk) 16:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Antalas. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 16:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, stop. There are so many errors in punctuation that it cannot be improved by someone other than you, because the meanings are entirely unclear. You keep restoring the same stuff, and that obviously will not do. Your first sentence missed at least one comma and didn't have final punctuation. The second sentence flouts English conventions. The second paragraph in the lead is WAY too long and combined with the grammatical/punctuation errors is completely incomprehensible. The infobox contains titles that seem like they're made up; the references contain syntactical errors. That you didn't see this while restoring, I don't understand, nor do I understand why you don't proofread your material especially after errors have been pointed out. I strongly urge you to think twice before reverting me yet again. Drmies (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you advice for improving the article? Maybe you can suggest me some synthesis, however threatening serves 0 purposes and especially not the one about working on informatives projects.

On my side im doing my best for peoples to learn from the best sources, as you noticed i use good references, i don't claim however it's perfect but i didn't understood why would you delete so much infos rather than helping me who done much sources researching and i think its unfair that you act with such hostility aswell even right now with what i can call a threat "I strongly urge you to think twice before reverting me yet again"are you trying to bully me lol and force me to let you deleting my work? If its your goal let me tell you that i will not back up from reverting you, but if you're trying to help me i will be someone with whom you might will appreciate to work with. FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 02:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I advice? Proofread. Follow our guidelines. Follow convention. Why did you have to be reverted two times before you conceded that a list of two dozen nicknames in the infobox was excessive? But I cannot proofread your material: it's too unclear because of a lack of proper punctuation, and I can't fix that. For the record, I teach English at a university and I've seen it all. Drmies (talk) 13:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Despite your previous warnings, user "FKnight Al Makhalifi" continues to make the same problematic edits on Antalas, repeatedly restoring content with numerous punctuation and grammatical errors and edit warring over it. It seems the partial block has not been effective. Skitash (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If my grammar and this article is having that much attention from you, don't remove the source and make the "grammar" better and do not remove my work. FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Antalas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Antalas) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... Ok fine, pity i can't contribute anymore it's not like i left a message saying i was about to synthetize and improve the article... FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 15:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FKnight Al Makhalifi, I saw Special:Diff/1222199250 and its edit summary. I still decided to block because you had previously unsuccessfully attempted similar improvements and made self-reverts before restoring content that others just objected to again. The block is just for the article itself, not any other page. This is meant to allow you to discuss at Talk:Antalas. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Afri are also unintellegible and you didn't provide an edit summary. Please see WP:CIR. Rsk6400 (talk) 08:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Afri shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 13:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on again, are you hunting me or something lol, i didn't do anything i gave my sources and synthetized at best my contribution i need something that justify your warning, also how is an edit war made when a person revert your contribution telling the reason and you don't undo what he did? This doesn't sound like an edit war to me but your actions like on Antalas page seems like harassement and specifically targetting me, like you will persecute me on each contributions i will do? FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 01:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting my contribution thanks you, i added references its not for you throw them out like it was nothing, get some seriousness really what's that actions you're undertaking are you trying to ruin my others contributions since the last small argues we had about Antalas article? FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 01:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Reggada, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 19:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, FKnight, we're not done. You are still, or again, edit warring, which you were blocked for earlier (pinging ToBeFree). Skitash, mind you, you are doing fine with the edit summaries, but it's probably a good idea to leave it be lest you get dragged into an edit war as well. You may want to set up a talk page section with some of the complaints outlined in there. FKnight, I explained some of the problems in my edit summary--they are the same as last time, and continuing this way will inevitable lead to a block. Drmies (talk) 22:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ToBeFree, I think the Rubicon has been crossed. Drmies (talk) 22:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We're not done right, because i don't see clearly what's wrong if nothing is explained and if my work is deleted it's like the time i wasted on was for nothing so of course i will not let that going so easily... FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 22:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well i do not thanks you for removing more than half of the references of the page and ruining Antalas article works i have done and wasted time on. FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More than half of the sources of the page vanished completely for no reasons but if you guys are willing to not have it therefore i cannot do much about it too bad. FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FKnight Al Makhalifi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Willing to not restart a rebellion without diplomacy. FKnight Al Makhalifi (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.