User talk:Fandom69

September 2022

Hello, I'm CycloneYoris. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Norton AntiVirus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris where should I provide the sources? Fandom69 (talk) 00:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the Norton AntiVirus article which is the one you just edited. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris Yeah but where abouts in the article? Fandom69 (talk) 00:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom of the lead paragraph would be fine. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dammit i don't know how to add the reference I'm not familiar with the source editing can you add reference https://winworldpc.com/product/norton-anti-virus/10 to the list? Fandom69 (talk) 04:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Michaelshea2004 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Michaelshea2004. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 13:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fandom69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Floppydisk05 isnt my account and I didn't make any disruptive edits or vandalize. Michaelshea2004 is my account though Fandom69 (talk) 13:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 13:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fandom69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Floppydisk05 is not one of my accounts Fandom69 (talk) 14:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Obvious socking is obvious. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Even if true, you have admitted to being the person behind the blocked account, Michaelshea2004. That means your block is appropriate. I will revoke talk page access here to match the block on your master account. --Yamla (talk) 14:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]