User talk:Faxspitter

March 2022

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ahnenpass—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 03:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was absolutely constructive, you did not even read it, I will be putting it back Faxspitter (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ahnenpass. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. {{User|wylie39}} {Talk} 03:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ahnenpass, you may be blocked from editing. {{User|wylie39}} {Talk} 03:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are constructive, unless you can explain what you mean here, your baseless accusation of vandalism is built on sand Faxspitter (talk) 03:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not removed sourced content from articles. If you believe that those sources are debunked or otherwise unreliable please start a discussion on the article's talk page. As things now stand you are in an WP:EDITWAR which can result in your account being blocked. Blue Riband► 03:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ahnenpass, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I would advise you to take this matter to the article's talk page. Continuing to revert and add this to the article will constitute edit warring. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC) TornadoLGS (talk) 03:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cringe Faxspitter (talk) 03:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Faxspitter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Cassiopeia talk 04:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That’s what I think about your nonsense.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Faxspitter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Cassiopeia talk 00:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Russian ruble. Cassiopeia talk 00:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]