User talk:FearTec

Welcome!

Hello, FearTec, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Snottygobble 23:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hello FearTec

Thanks for uploading your images to Wikipedia - very appreciated. Can I however ask you to upload them to Commons instead? Works just like Wikipedia for most things, but the images will be much better categorised (by you - or by obsessives like me ;-) and can be used by everyone, not just on Wikipedia. In theory, ALL images that are under public domain or a free license *should* be uploaded to Commons anyway. Would be great if you could do so as well. Ingolfson 23:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I have already started uploading some of your Wikipedia images to Commons. This will eventually cause them to be deleted here on Wikipedia. Please do not let that frustrate you - as I explained, they will still be available. In fact, easier available than before. Ingolfson 23:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you upload images to Commons, please be sure to put them in categories, or they will be 'lost'. If you do not know which category to put them in, please place them at least in a top level category like "Category:New Zealand" so that other people can then find and finish sorting them. Cheers. Any questions, just ask me. Same user name on both projects. Ingolfson 23:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As noted, I am already moving some of your images to Commons. If you want to move any that I haven't moved yet (or those of someone else), please use this tool. It will correctly transfer the information over, though you may need to add categories by hand. Ingolfson 23:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I am overloading you with info right now - if you move an image to Commons, you also need to place the following tag on the Wikipedia version of the image: {{subst:ncd}} so that it will get deleted here (or {{subst:ncd|Image:NEWNAME.jpg}} if you have changed the image name). If that is all too confusing for you at the moment, don't worry. Just get an account at Commons, upload your new pictures there, and the old ones will be transferred later. Ingolfson 23:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Galleries

Hi FearTec, me AGAIN. I recently read how necomers to Wikipedia nowadays are often 'accosted' by the more experienced users, and find it harder and harder to get into the project. I sure hope my comments here are not having the effect of driving you away? We very much appreciate someone who adds a lot to our project.

That said, can I ask you to go a bit more gently on adding galleries to articles? Galleries are a rather contentious issue. Many editors (me included) don't like them on articles, because they tend to grow very quickly and tend to be... oh well, too many images in an article just end up overwhelming the text! Its an encyclopedia, not an image databank - that is Commons, as I described to you above.

So when an article already has images, one should ask oneself: Does it really need more (most articles should not have more than 1-2 images per visible screen on your monitor (i.e. longer articles can have much more, but they need a lot of text first). If new images are to be added, the question should be: do they depict some important part that hasn't been shown, and can they replace one that is already there?

If the question to the above issues is no, then they should be uploaded to Commons instead, where there is no limit to the images that can be uploaded for a particular subject. With a Commons link usually available on articles like Doubtful Sound, these are easily available.

Okay, hope the above clarified why I changed some of your galleries. Some of your photos are really real nice, which is why I moved a part into the main article too. Okay, preaching over - happy editing. Ingolfson 00:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to add images to articles, have an eye out for articles that have no images at all yet. Or expand articles so that you can add more images to them without dominating the text. Or even create new articles just so that you can use your pictures ;-) Not *quite* kidding with that last comment. I have done so before - but make sure that the subject is worth an article, or it will just get deleted. Ingolfson 00:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Physignathus lesuerii

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Physignathus lesuerii, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.kingsnake.com/oz/lizards/agamids/plesuerii.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Tamworth Lightning FearTec.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Tamworth Lightning FearTec.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 07:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:FAH-SMP.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:FAH-SMP.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang (talk) 20:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milford Track River.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Milford Track River.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]