User talk:FerntreeGully

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hearts Don't Lie, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hearts Don't Lie was changed by FerntreeGully (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2010-04-08T06:55:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to American and British English differences. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

A tag has been placed on ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Caleb Jon^talk 09:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Etherkelt

The article Etherkelt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article about a book that has not been written yet. Proposed for deletion per WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 08:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Etherkelt for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Etherkelt, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etherkelt until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kudpung (talk) 06:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:ZackMerrickShirtless.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:ZackMerrickShirtless.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/amandaderosa/2779899641/. As a copyright violation, File:ZackMerrickShirtless.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:ZackMerrickShirtless.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:ZackMerrickShirtless.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:ZackMerrickShirtless.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:ZackMerrickShirtless.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 11:14, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Royaume Uni listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Royaume Uni. Since you had some involvement with the Royaume Uni redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 06:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Royaume Uni" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Royaume Uni. Since you had some involvement with the Royaume Uni redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Interstellarity (talk) 18:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Royaume Uni" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Royaume Uni. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 11#Royaume Uni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]