User talk:Fideliosr

Dabangg 2

Hello Fideliosr,the ref you added here is correct one but after some time the content will be changed but url remains same.So we prefer not to add it as i did it earlier.I hope you would notice this.Well then,keep up good work---zeeyanketu ^discutez 11:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Chennai Express

Yes, of course. They also need spacings, to make the section easy to read.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 05:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dhoom 3

GoW and Jthj2012 are one and the same, both either SRK fans or Aamir Khan/Dhoom 3 haters. I am filing an SPI, until then keep them at bay. Soham (talk) 13:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. This has happened a lot, you know. Almost every time when a SRK, Salman or Aamir film releases. Lots of characters in here :) Fideliosr (talk) 13:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Soham (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Soham (talk) 13:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and merry christmas to you too! Fideliosr (talk) 13:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar

This, you should have gotten during the time Chennai Express released. You were the only one amongst a slew of brainless SRK fans who dared to stand for WP:RS and WP:NPOV with figures of Boxoffice.com. Now you're doing the same which is commendable. This is your 1st Barnstar I guess and I am happy to be the lucky one to give it to you. Cherish & Savour it because the first experience of receiving a barnstar is special and it happens only once... Soham (talk) 13:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can't believe I'm noticed at last. Thought I was the only crusader against "them" fanboys :) Thanks and regards. Fideliosr (talk) 13:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

upload the display picture of Govinda(actor)

hi Fideliosr , it is my humble request for you to Please upload the display picture of Govinda(actor) on wikipedia (Link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Govinda_%28actor%29). I have uploaded it so many times but everytime some issue occurs regarding license or copyright. Current display picture of Govinda is also uploaded by me and still some issue of copyright. I dont know how to fix it or upload image successfully. You can find best pictures of Govinda here http://themirchmasala.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/govinda-photoshoot.jpg

http://hamaraphotos.com/albums300_2012/wpw-20130504/hpse_normal__1644962347_%20Govinda%20photo%20shoot%20for%20designer%20Suprabha%20Jain%20%289%29.jpg

So it would be much better if you delete my picture and upload either the pictures whose link i have given above of Govinda without any licensing/copyright issue or upload any best picture of Govinda. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanraj6 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will surely try to find something. Cheers :) Fideliosr (talk) 12:56, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

disappointing comment on SRK

...considering you only fixed one of the "many". Some thanks for hard work would be nice, instead of only criticism. I think maybe I will ask the guild of copy editors look it over. BollyJeff | talk 16:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bollyjeff, you did some really terrific work which is really appreciated. I only meant that the overall grammar of the article is not tight. Thanks! Fideliosr (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! BollyJeff | talk 19:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that cinematic history part; I removed it. Please have a closer look and and make comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Shah Rukh Khan/archive1 if you have time. The article has been copy edited by the GOCE since your comment on the grammar. I have also regrouped things a bit, and and enhanced the text with material from Chopra's book. I would like to take this to FAC. BollyJeff | talk 01:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! I will surely have a closer look. Fideliosr (talk) 13:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saad Lamjarred, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saad Lamjarred

Hello just wondering why you removed the YouTube video as a source, it helps keep the view count more updated as the other source only states 103 million? Regards, Lucky102 (talk) 11:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because YouTube is not a reliable source. Regards, Fideliosr (talk) 12:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! BollyJeff | talk 04:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Javed Miandad page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fideliosr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Eida Al Menhali

Hi, I'm Domdeparis. Fideliosr, thanks for creating Eida Al Menhali!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please read WP:NMUSIC as the sources are too weak to pass this or WP:GNG

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dom from Paris (talk) 11:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fideliosr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]