User talk:Fillairs
AfD nomination of Contrarian Journalism
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
I have nominated Contrarian Journalism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contrarian Journalism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. andy (talk) 08:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]Hello, Fillairs. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic WP:ANI#Suspected sockpuppetry at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.2FContrarian Journalism. Thank you. EdJohnston (talk) 03:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted comments
[edit]About this. I deleted your comments, once an administrator has closed an AFD, the discussion is turned into an archive and no further posts are permitted in that debate - it becomes a historical record. If you are unhappy with the article being deleted, then you need to need to head over to WP:DRV where people will consider if the administrator's reasons for closing the debate as a delete were valid. --Cameron Scott (talk) 21:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Further Question Are you the Administrator?
Fillairs (talk) 21:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Who closed it? no - that was Seicer - the archiving process is the automatic outcome of a closed AFD regardless of if it's Keep or close. --Cameron Scott (talk) 21:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)