User talk:Firekong808

SPI

If you think someone is a sock, then submit an WP:SPI; do not make posts over an admin's signature, as you have done with Blablubbs in this post. SandyGeorgia (Talk)

I rewrote the template and submitted an WP:SPI and singed it as my own. FireKong808 (Talk)

Then you need to wait for the SPI to be addressed and for the socks to be confirmed. (The evidence that you submitted is slim.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 03:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Firekong808 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done nothing wrong other than remind him that MegaMack was a sockpuppet for Mack2. I was new at the time, so Sandy reminded me on my wall. Just because I made just ONE mistake doesn’t mean you have to block me permanently.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:33, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Firekong808 (talk) 04:05, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]