User talk:Fjzzhongyi

Welcome!

Hello, Fjzzhongyi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sujata Banerjee, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sujata Banerjee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sujata Banerjee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sujata Banerjee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sujata Banerjee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujata Banerjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 13:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anees Shaikh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anees Shaikh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Razer^Talk 05:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zhang Ying (software engineer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhang Ying (software engineer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Ying (software engineer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me) 07:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft First

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me) 07:58, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anees Shaikh

The article Anees Shaikh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying content to Wikipedia

It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, as you did at Aditya Akella, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account, for the simple reason that very often people come to Wikipedia and falsely claim to have copyright rights that in fact they don't have. Also, even on the rare occasions when there is no copyright problem, content from an organisation or business's own website is not usually suitable for a Wikipedia article, as it is almost invariably written in terms designed to promote the organisation and give a good impression of it, rather than presenting it from a neutral point of view, as required for a Wikipedia article. Such promotional editing is not permitted by Wikipedia policy. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 01:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fjzzhongyi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a green-hand here. Certainly I did something wrong like removing the delete template by mistake, absolutely not on purpose. But it was for I completed the modification in a hurry maybe, result in neglecting it. It can be provable by later modifications to other articles which are also placed a probable delete tag. In addition, I do no harm to wiki, but for creating some articles for introducing some outstanding computer scientists. And I declare that I did all throughby my own account. And I'll avoid making such mistakes and comply with the orders you made.Fjzzhongyi (talk) 03:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Although in the block reason the blocking administrator mentioned only the issue of multiple accounts, there are other issues which are perhaps more important, including one which the blocking administrator did mention as a reason for blocking in the discussion which led to the block, though not here. Clearly this account and the account Wenfeiwu have been collaborating, in ways which are not permitted by Wikipedia policy. If that were the only issue, I would be inclined to take the view that as new editors you had no reason to know that was the case, and to regard a friendly warning not to do the same as enough. However, there is also no doubt that some of your editing has been promotional in character, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy, and it has been suggested that your sole purpose here is promotion of the people you have been writing about. Moreover, the clearest and most unambiguous problem is that you have persistently added copyright-infringing content to Wikipedia articles, and you ignored the message above explaining why doing so is unacceptable, and continued to do the same. Unless and until you show that you understand that and will not do the same again, unblocking you will not be to the benefit of the project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fjzzhongyi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, thanks for your remind very much. It was true that within last request I focused on contesting that Wenfeiwu and I were not the same editor, but skipped some more important issue like copyright. I felt sorry for violating policies of wiki and interrupting you again. I admit that I had read the previous prompt about Copying content, which partly leads to the block. However, in that piece of notice, my edit was stated "not suitable", which consequently gave rise to the behavior that I wrongly and mistakenly did that again. Owing to your alert, I do realize that such edit could fatally make lots of trouble that we are all unwilling to meet. Furthermore, I promise that I'll obey the rules and policies, especially on copyright, and take into account all comments, both advice and criticism. And I won't repeat deprecated or banned edits which let you down.

Decline reason:

You have to explain your connection to Wenfeiwu;
You have to address your promotional edits. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.