User talk:Fkorning
Welcome!
Hello, Fkorning, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like FKorning, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 22:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on FKorning requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 22:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- You have a little more latitude on your user page, but you still shouldn't use it to advertise yourself. See WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Fast Simple QSO
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Fast Simple QSO requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/MFSK/FSQweb.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]Hello Fkorning! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note - just providing credit to the source or author of copyrighted content is not sufficient. Such usage may be covered by fair use,, but Wikipedia doe snot go by fair use but has chosen a stricter standard of non-free content. You are welcome to write the article in your own words, but pasting in copyrighted material is not allowed. -- Whpq (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- https://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/MFSK/FSQweb.htm are the authors of the encoding. This is their actual site, their actual whitepaper. In the HAM world citing their callsign is attribution enough. The threshold you are demanding (to paraphrase rather than cite) runs the risk of introducing errors, as I am no HAM expert. The minuscule paragraph I cited is succinct yet accurate. I agree it can and should be cited in quotations, but to censor the page altogether is ridiculous. This is a real encoding protocol and is quite popular. It deserves its own page. FKorning (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- The only reason it was deleted was the amount of copyrighted content in the article. So again, you can create a new article using your own words. If you need help, you might try Wikipedia:WikiProject Amateur radio. The project is marked semi-active but you may be able to find some editors there that can assist you. -- Whpq (talk) 20:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- https://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/MFSK/FSQweb.htm are the authors of the encoding. This is their actual site, their actual whitepaper. In the HAM world citing their callsign is attribution enough. The threshold you are demanding (to paraphrase rather than cite) runs the risk of introducing errors, as I am no HAM expert. The minuscule paragraph I cited is succinct yet accurate. I agree it can and should be cited in quotations, but to censor the page altogether is ridiculous. This is a real encoding protocol and is quite popular. It deserves its own page. FKorning (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)