User talk:Flat Out/Archives/2015/February

content showing in kachhwaha is irrelevant````

can you please make it clear that why the content showing 5 year back has been changed in kachhwaha and on what basis?```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.98.242.139 (talk) 11:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, talk but I have no idea what you are talking about. I haven't edited that article in a year. Flat Out let's discuss it 23:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of article

Sinocare is a publicly traded company of a major stock exchange of a major economy. I do not see how any company fitting that criteria should be removed by speedy delete. Muzzleflash (talk) 05:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Muzzleflash, if it meets WP:CORP it will survive but at the moment its not sourced at all. Flat Out let's discuss it 05:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

The notability guideline you cite strongly suggests a publicly traded company on a major exchange is notable. It appears you made an error when you deleted the journal article that was a reference after finding no mention of the company. In that article the company is prominently mentioned. Muzzleflash (talk) 10:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Muzzleflash since the article has been deleted I am unable to go back and look at the source, but I check it twice and Sinocare wasn't mentioned. In any case, that one source is not enough to support notability and the mere existence on a promiment exchange does not not automatically support notability - it's just that most listed companies also have been written about my multiple independent and secondary sources. best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 02:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Promotional articles

Flat Out: Thank you for your messages and warnings. I have made numerous edits to try to comply with the requirements. I believe that this entry is no longer promotional in nature, but I need further guidance as where the line is being crossed so that I can make further revisions. The language is simply meant to describe the work of the company and its owner, not to solicit business in any way. I would really appreciate your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvbobme (talk • contribs) 05:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Tvbobme the issue is that you have now tried 3 times to write an article that promotes yourself. The content is unsourced and fails to meet any of the requirements of either a biography or a company. Your username is also promotional and in violation of Wikipedia policy. Flat Out let's discuss it 06:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

I have a better understanding of the violations now, and I will make the necessary adjustments to comply. Thanks for your understanding and patience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvbobme (talk • contribs) 06:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of article

Sinocare is a publicly traded company of a major stock exchange of a major economy. I do not see how any company fitting that criteria should be removed by speedy delete. Muzzleflash (talk) 05:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Muzzleflash, if it meets WP:CORP it will survive but at the moment its not sourced at all. Flat Out let's discuss it 05:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

The notability guideline you cite strongly suggests a publicly traded company on a major exchange is notable. It appears you made an error when you deleted the journal article that was a reference after finding no mention of the company. In that article the company is prominently mentioned. Muzzleflash (talk) 10:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Muzzleflash since the article has been deleted I am unable to go back and look at the source, but I check it twice and Sinocare wasn't mentioned. In any case, that one source is not enough to support notability and the mere existence on a promiment exchange does not not automatically support notability - it's just that most listed companies also have been written about my multiple independent and secondary sources. best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 02:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Promotional articles

Flat Out: Thank you for your messages and warnings. I have made numerous edits to try to comply with the requirements. I believe that this entry is no longer promotional in nature, but I need further guidance as where the line is being crossed so that I can make further revisions. The language is simply meant to describe the work of the company and its owner, not to solicit business in any way. I would really appreciate your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvbobme (talk • contribs) 05:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Tvbobme the issue is that you have now tried 3 times to write an article that promotes yourself. The content is unsourced and fails to meet any of the requirements of either a biography or a company. Your username is also promotional and in violation of Wikipedia policy. Flat Out let's discuss it 06:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

I have a better understanding of the violations now, and I will make the necessary adjustments to comply. Thanks for your understanding and patience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvbobme (talk • contribs) 06:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Question

why can't i use people as references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Footballjack (talk • contribs) 16:03, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Footballjack and thanks for the question. Sources need to be able to be verified by other editors. A name doesn't give us enough information about a source that we can verify that they have said/written what the article says. Flat Out let's discuss it 22:13, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Article

Hello, I witten info about Celltrion Healthcare company located in Korea. This company's info related Biosimilar Drug just like Remsima, Johnson & Johnson's Remicade. One of the FDA's advisory committees has circled March 17 on the calendar for its review of Celltrion's Remsima, a biosimilar of Johnson & Johnson's ($JNJ) Remicade that is now in line to become the second knockoff to reach the U.S. market. Biosimilar drug market is growing up every day, but there's any of these company's info. So I think it should be written in Wiki - Someone wants to know about Biosimilar Drug companies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plutocrat2101 (talk • contribs) 06:07, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Plutocrat2101, When independant sources have written about the company then you might consider re-submitting an article. As it stands the company is not notable. Flat Out let's discuss it 06:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

How can I edit this company page notable?

Your 3RR complaint about AC/DC

Hello Flat Out. Regarding Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Wasp-1992 reported by User:Flat Out (Result: ). It looks like the Guardian has now confirmed that Slade will be touring with the band. Do you think this will settle the dispute? If so, can the 3RR be closed without action? You can reply at the noticeboard. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

thanksEdJohnston, unfortunately Slades touring status is not in dispute. I'm not sure it is going to help..Best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 19:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

ePLAR

This page will showcase the new echo parameter ePLAR. The first public showing of supporting clinical data data will be at the American College of Cardiology conference in San Diego on Monday 16.3.2015. There will be two referencable presentations/publications at that meeting. A paper is in review at Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. Once these publications and presentations are released, the ePLAR will certainly be noteworthy and referencable and valid. Please allow the page to stay live until those supporting data can be added in 2 weeks time. Cheers Greg Scalia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.58.60.7 (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

As noted on a comment a few minutes ago (before I logged in), supporting presentations and publications for ePLAR will be in the public domain in 2 weeks. Please allow the page to stand until that time, as it will certainly be noteworthy and referenced then Greg Scalia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmscalia (talk • contribs) 22:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

ePLAR is being presented at ACC meeting on the 16.3.2015. Greg Scalia is well published author/researcher on the subject of echocardiography. http://www.pubfacts.com/author/Greg+Scalia Not unfeasible to await the 2 weeks for the publication and subsequent peer review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMikol23 (talk • contribs) 08:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Gmscalia and TheMikol23 you both have a clear conflict of interest and should refrain from editing the article. Please see WP:COI. Flat Out let's discuss it 06:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

User: Flat Out i have no conflict at all. There is nothing overblown or self promoting about the ePLAR article, it simply outlines a new echocardiogram parameter which is in development, enlisting the source of the theory to validate my work and add references. As it is will not be text books for many months, wikipedia is the appropriate place. It is egregious use of you to be pushing for deletion of information which will be used in the education of medial diagnosis. Simply because the article is partially edited by the original source the ePLAR theory, whom has more than ample credibility as source in in the field or echo cardiology. TheMikol23 (talk) 01:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

TheMikol23 you fail to understand how wikipedia works. Until independent, secondary sources have written about the subject it doesn't meet wikipedia standards for notability. You might also have another read of WP:COI and WP:SOCK. Flat Out let's discuss it 05:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

User Name

Hi Flat Out, I went through the username policy but was unable to understand why my name is in violation of it. Could you help me further on this please? Thank you! Also, thanks for the response to my query. Teamyoddhas (talk) 06:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Teamyoddhas Team Yoddhas - it implies you are representing the organisation. 09:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)