User talk:Fsstickman1

August 2023

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.DarmaniLink (talk) 15:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at TransPennine Express, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Danners430 (talk) 16:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fsstickman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

was not given promised warning Fsstickman1 (talk) 21:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The abuse filter shows that you repeatedly tried to vandalise, for which your were warned, before one of your edits slipped through. No thank you. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:17, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

this ban is unfair i admit to damaging one page subtly and received a warning which i accepted now i have been banned after no further vandalisation I HAVE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE and am writing a complaint. if my permmissions are not restored i will have to take the matter very seriously.

yours sincerely fsstickman1 Fsstickman1 (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fsstickman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

was not given warning then a previous unblock request was turned dwon based on false information Fsstickman1 (talk) 21:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You aren't entitled to warnings. You are free to take the matter as seriously as you like (keeping in mind WP:NLT), nothing here convinces me you plan to be a constructive editor. Yamla (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fsstickman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my request to lift an unfair block have been refused multiple times one told me i continued to vandilize the page after i was warned (which is not true) and the other told me that vandilism gives a immideate block. i have PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE to prove these wrong and have sent several complaints to the official wikimedia email one moderator send me a very rude denial message. i have read the terms of use and beleive i have been unfairly treated. i am concidering exposing thease messages on social media. Fsstickman1 (talk) 22:23, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am removing talk page access. Instead of addressing the vandalism, which the user admits to doing above, the user has decided to claim the action was unfair. Editors are here to build an encyclopedia, and editors should not have to be given warnings to avoid vandalising pages. Instead of claiming that this is unfair, please address the concerns and ensure the community that these actions will not happen again. Z1720 (talk) 01:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.