User talk:Funkihunter

Welcome

Hello, Funkihunter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

OBR

I see you added an entry to OBR, but it did not link to an existing Wikipedia article, so I have removed it. As it says at the bottom, "This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title OBR" - a disambiguation page lists Wikipedia articles that contain relevant information, not all uses of a term. Also, please be careful not to rewrite and therefore lose an existing entry if you add to a disambiguation page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. At my talk page you wrote:

"Did you read the summary note I wrote when I posted the edit? I did not remove anything, and I was working on the page. If the convention is to write the page and then link and remove disambiguation, I stand corrected. I did change the order of the entries on the page as they were not alphabetical. Funkihunter (talk) 14:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)".

Firstly, apologies for getting it wrong about the overwriting - I've struck that comment. And yes, it is convention to write the article first, as disambiguation pages should not have entries that do not have live links. As I see you have now written the article, I have reinstated your addition to OBR. Regarding the "summary note I wrote when I posted the edit", I don't actually see any edit summary here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:36, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of OBR10

The article OBR10 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks to be an ad culled from this page: https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/262196-one-big-raid-10-the-new-standard-in-server-storage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:19, 9 May 2017 (UTC)