User talk:Fuzzy

{{welcome}} Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 17:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here from around 2004, but it's nice to get a welcome note at last... Fuzzy 00:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm just curious, is this your original username (As a noob, your lack of Talk history is curious to me )? Tewfik^Talk 16:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was my original username, which I almost haven't used up until now. Most of my previous edits were anonymous, but I decided it's time to revive my username. Fuzzy 19:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your requests at WP:CVU[edit]

Fuzzy, this issue is about a POV edit war, or perhaps POV andalism. You really should try asking for mediation, or else open an RFC. This issue is a bit outside the scope of the CVU. If you need help going through the mediation request or RfC process, feel free to ask me on my talk. -- SB_Johnny | ^talk 14:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why not?[edit]

Yousaf465 wrote in my talk-page: == I'm not in NSa == was it a cipher message.HAve funYousaf465

Me, cleaning up comment: (I don't care if Yousaf465 is working in the NSA.)

Yousaf465 clarified himself: == why! == I'm not in nSa nor have link to it.so that meassage i sent was not a cipher at all.you should have understood it.Yousaf465

Look man, you probably want to say something, even though what exactly that something is I can only guess. Words are medium to carry ideas between people, but only when placed in the correct form and context. The words themselves, out-of-context and out-of-form, are just collections of letters, which most people, myself included, do not have the patience to decipher. If you want people to understand you, pay some more attention to your text and wording before submitting. That all. Fuzzy 19:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Greenmovementlogo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Greenmovementlogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 22:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed (hopefully). Fuzzy (talk) 11:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Doe[edit]

Just noticed you replied to me on John Doe. Not sure what you mean by "creating a subpage," but I've gone into the history and copied the list to the talk page for further reference if necessary. Hope that's kind of what you're getting at. If not, msg me, thanks! 66.183.69.201 (talk) 03:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Putting the list at the talk page is also ok. Thnx. Fuzzy (talk) 13:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The apartheid article.[edit]

I noticed that you informed editors at WP:Israel of the dispute in this article but forgot to inform the editors at WP:Palestine. May I suggest that you do so now? It is regarded as bad form for an editor to notify only those who are likely to lean towards one side of a content dispute that it exists. I have already informed editors at WP:IPCOLL.--Peter cohen (talk) 22:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to inform the editors at WP:Palestine. Thanks, – Fuzzy – 00:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing[edit]

If a conflict is still ongoing, that means there are no winners and losers yet. Do not add belligerents to ongoing conflicts. B-Machine (talk) 16:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know, that is the reason I placed the parties vertically rather then horizontally. If you don't want that format, no prob, just revert the edits over there. – Fuzzy – 16:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Fuzzy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Fuzzy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"13256278887989457651018865901401704640" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 13256278887989457651018865901401704640. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#13256278887989457651018865901401704640 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. O.N.R. ^(talk) 10:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Are you FuzzyBot? --105.105.213.209 (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not FuzzyBot. User:FuzzyBot is an automated bot of the Translation Team at meta. – Fuzzy – 08:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]