User talk:G0Y Veh

G0Y Veh, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi G0Y Veh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

December 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at G0y, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -Crossroads- (talk) 17:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -Crossroads- (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

G0Y Veh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The current page as of 01/2020 and prior contains many factual errors. It was my attempt as the primary responsible for creating the entire global g0ys movement to add corrections, clarity & additional links to correct the current version of the page. It seems obvious that in order to correct inaccurate content that accurate content, links, quotes and citations are the only solution. This was attempted and I was informed that including such was grandstanding. If Ghandi included his own quotes on a page about him, - would that also be "grandstanding"? It is clear that the original author is biased against the g0ys movement which is why the corrected content was reversed by them and replaced with former biased inaccuracies. This is simply yet another example of why Wikipedia cannot be used as a reliable information resource. A history of my attempted additions & corrective changes speaks for itself and any editor that looks into that history can readily see where the actual bias is. The primary g0ys website at www.g0ys.org has noted the bias and included the actual cryptographic HASH the accurate page should yield - as opposed to the current HASH. This caveat essentially disqualifies WikiPedia as a reliable g0ys information resource. G0Y Veh (talk) 17:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every part of this unblock request reads like a justification to leave the block in place. If you wish to be unblocked, start with WP:GAB and then read WP:COI and WP:NOT. You'll also want to check out WP:RS, because Wikipedia explicitly isn't a reliable resource. Yamla (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.