Jump to content

User talk:MrMimikyu1998

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Garchomp2017)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hi MrMimikyu1998! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2022 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2022, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. You and 4me689 are very close to edit warring. Start a discussion on the talk page about the image.. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just did put the talk page out there. Kyu (talk) 23:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I've warned 4me689 for the same thing as well. I don't care what image gets used, you just need to stop arguing over the image to use. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry for arguing with you on the Angela Lansbury picture, hopefully we can corroborate in the future and become good contributors.
(also you mind go and reply at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Years#Survey) 4me689 (talk) 00:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It’s okay. I accept your apology Kyu (talk) 00:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for forgetting me, also what's your opinion on collages on year articles, you haven't placed your opinion yet I've been really curious, put it at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Years#Survey. 4me689 (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem and I think it’s a great idea! Kyu (talk) 02:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
4me689, were you not (multiple times) advised to stop WP:CANVASSING for support? GoodDay (talk) 02:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have to admit yes but I don't want to be banned so can we just wait for the results. I just want to move on and not be banned 4me689 (talk) 02:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Admitting it is too late, as you've already done it. What will it take to make you stop? GoodDay (talk) 02:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
how you even knew that I was on This Talk page 4me689 (talk) 02:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Breaking Swipe.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Breaking Swipe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about RFC

[edit]

Hi, where can I find the RFC which got rid of the births and deaths for each year? Why aren’t people born before 1980 included? Interstellarity (talk) 13:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1144165042#RFC:_split_births_&_deaths_from_year_articles Kyu (talk) 13:18, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

respecting the hito

[edit]

respecting the hitohito Lynxano (talk) 13:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lmao 😂 Kyu (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi!

I saw that you have added many wrong copyright expiration year templates to file information pages.

In the United States, the copyright term expires 95 years after publication (if published before 1978). The copyright term is not based on the author's death year.

In Europe, the copyright term expires 70 years after the death of the author (not 95 years). Exception: 80 years in Spain if the author died before 1987. The copyright term is based on the author's death year, not the year of publication.

When the copyright term is based on the year of death, you should use the year of death of the photographer, not the year of death of the subject of the photo. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I got a bit carried away on which comes first. Idk why I thought it was 95 years after death. Kyu (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No big problem. I think that I fixed all of them. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you've started changing copyright-expiration dates to incorrect years again, e.g. at File:The Cat in the Hat.png. Please remember that for pre-1978 U.S. works, copyright expires 95 years after publication, not 70 years after the death of the author. I would advise avoiding changing copyright dates on images in the future unless you've checked c:Commons:Hirtle chart and you're absolutely sure that your change is correct. pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 06:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then. It's hard to tell which came first though 🤔
After all, it can/can't be confusing on weather which came first… Kyu (talk) 10:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, I also know Canada had its copyright extended from 50 years pma to 70 years pma as of 1 January 2023 per this link
I believe I should have looked at the chart more further, I apologize 😞 Kyu (talk) 11:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • When the copyright term is based on the year of death, the copyright expiration to the text of a book is based on the death year of the author, whereas the copyright expiration to pictures is based on the death year of the illustrator. The art is often not made by the same person as the one who wrote the text, although there are exceptions, for example Elsa Beskow. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah okay. I was a bit confused on which came first though. I did however fix up the copyright extension on the Noreen's Nocturne files as per the link since Canada did got its copyright extended from 50 years pma to 70 years pma. Sometimes I cannot tell which comes first and I do apologize 😞 Kyu (talk) 17:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]