User talk:Gargoyle Queen

September 2019

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. [1] MrOllie (talk) 01:08, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 05:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gargoyle Queen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On the 'Gargyole Gecko' wiki, I attempted to add an external link to one of my webpages that describe Gargoyle Gecko morphology in detail with examples. There are no purchasing links on my website and no external advertisements. There is too much information to add to the wiki page, but it is useful information in identifying an exhaustive list of traits found within the species. There is another business page linked to the external links (who does have purchasing ability active on their site) so I do not understand the difference, or the block for that action. If un-allowed that is fine, but please unblock this account and remove blacklist for a first offense. I was just trying to contribute information I thought useful and the link had already been removed prior to my block. . Gargoyle Queen (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline due to delay. You may file again but please read my comments below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 01:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The other website was removed on Sept. 4. Your website has not been blacklisted as that would be reserved mostly for repeat spammers and I checked the list.

Reading list:

After reading those policies and guidelines, respond below and tell us what and how you would edit.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 23:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]