User talk:Germash19

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Germash19! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 21:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3-RR WARNING

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Continuation War. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.Peltimikko (talk) 01:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Nick-D (talk) 10:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Continuation War is one of the Eastern European articles subject to DIGWUREN sanctions

Hello Germash19. You and Wanderer602 are getting into some trouble on that article, and I notice you were both blocked recently for 24 hours. Admins are unlikely to permit a two-person dispute to continue raging for several weeks on that article. More admin sanctions are possible on either or both parties. I urge you to be patient and work through the talk age. For instance, to settle the question whether any statistics from the Leningrad siege belong in this article. One way to do this is to open a WP:Request for comment. I am also placing you on formal notice regarding the discretionary sanctions for articles in eastern Europe.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

— Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Continuation War mediation

Hi Germash19, I just saw your comment at Talk:Continuation War, and wanted to say sorry. I shouldn't have reverted your edits so quickly, and I should have asked you about it first. If you're willing to hear my reasons for reverting, I hope that you can understand my actions a little better. Some of the things that you wrote about are also being disputed by the mediation participants, and in the mediation we are in the process of finding a compromise agreement that everyone can accept. Agreeing on a compromise version is a lot easier if the version in the article doesn't change while mediation is going on, so I reverted your edits to make life easier for myself and the other mediation parties. It wasn't really anything to do with the neutrality of your edits. If you are still interested in editing this article, I would like you to reconsider taking part in the mediation. The more users we have there who are interested in the article, the better the chance that the solution will be neutral, and the longer the result will stick. Please let me know if you have any questions about this - I'll be glad to answer them. All the best — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 10:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of the busiest airports in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yeadon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of the busiest airports in Europe

As agreed from the beginning, European airports are defined as those that are within the airspace of the member and candidate states of The Council of Europe. (See discussion). Therefore, please don't delete any Canarian, Cypriot and Russian airports. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kostja1975 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Answered in that article--Germash19 (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You do not get to "warn" me or any other user. You are NOT an admin of Wikipedia. Stop threatening users and stop vandalizing entries! Ian 1975 (talk) 21:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Equality. Any user can issue a warning. Even an anonymous (ip) can do it.

--Germash19 (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Continuation War/Soviet–Finnish Front of the Great Patriotic War

Hey! You might have noticed I'm trying to build the Continuation War article to GA-level. I'm very happy to keep it as NPOV as possible between Finnish, Russian and Western sources. If you spot something not addressed properly enough, just ping me and I think I'll be able to come to a pro and contra solution! Manelolo (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Answered in that article. --Germash19 (talk) 11:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1st warning for disruptive editing in the article List of the busiest airports in Europe

Please discontinue disruptive editing in the article List of the busiest airports in Europe, otherwise this will be reported to Administrator. If you have any further arguments, please post them in the corresponding Talk section. added by Kostja (talk • 12:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you show examples of «disruptive editing»?--Germash19 (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1], [2], [3]. Persistent and unjustified deletion of Canarian, Cypriot and Russian airports, removal of reference to the Council of Europe criteria.--Kostja1975 (talk) 22:36, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The link shows that I deleted non-European airports from the article about airports in Europe.--Germash19 (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2nd warning for disruptive editing in the article List of the busiest airports in Europe

2nd and last warning before for disruptive editing in the article List of the busiest airports in Europe, another removal of airports in the European airspace will lead to report of vandalism. Added by Kostja (talk • 13:41, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Germash19. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First warning for edit warring

Your recent editing history at Vasco da Gama Bridge shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Preceding unsigned comment added by Александр Мотин 10:05, 1 December 2018

Clarification. You continue remove portions of page content confirmed by reliable sources without adequate explanation.--Germash19 (talk) 21:43, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Krasnodar International Airport

Hello, Germash19. I noticed that you recently added a few notes to the Krasnodar International Airport in the article List of the busiest airports in Europe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed since then, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, and Krasnodar is located within southern European Russia, meaning it is located entirely within Europe, and not at the boundary of Europe and Asia. if you think you have a reason on why they should be added back, you can discuss it on the article's talk page. Thank you. Danloud ^(Talk) 16:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not an Admin sir, you do not get to warn other users, and no i am not going to get banned. I like how you vandalize yourself, do not even discuss or answer me here, and decide to warn me. You also use information from other Encyclopedias in Wikipedia, interesting. Danloud ^(Talk) 09:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can warn, even an anonymous person. You asked for sources. Although they were already available in the article by internal link. I added reliable sources directly to the article. You, for some reason, delete the text from the article with RS. This is a violation of the rule WP:DIS: "some tendentious editors engage in disruptive deletions as well. An example is repeated deletion of reliable sources posted by other editors." --Germash19 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Когда численность погибших

Когда численность погибших . От COVID - ЧОВИД 19 сравняется . Или, превысить . Количество погибших в США . Ну, вот тогда ! Никто не посмеет ртыкать пальцем в сторону ... Великой Ядерной Державы !2A02:A03F:6936:6100:547B:3FCA:9A5E:B90D (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Что это? --Germash19 (talk) 18:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]