User talk:Germash19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Some cookies to welcome you! Face-smile.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia, Germash19! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 talk 21:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

3-RR WARNING[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Continuation War. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.Peltimikko (talk) 01:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Nick-D (talk) 10:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Continuation War is one of the Eastern European articles subject to DIGWUREN sanctions[edit]

Hello Germash19. You and Wanderer602 are getting into some trouble on that article, and I notice you were both blocked recently for 24 hours. Admins are unlikely to permit a two-person dispute to continue raging for several weeks on that article. More admin sanctions are possible on either or both parties. I urge you to be patient and work through the talk age. For instance, to settle the question whether any statistics from the Leningrad siege belong in this article. One way to do this is to open a WP:Request for comment. I am also placing you on formal notice regarding the discretionary sanctions for articles in eastern Europe.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

— Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Continuation War mediation[edit]

Hi Germash19, I just saw your comment at Talk:Continuation War, and wanted to say sorry. I shouldn't have reverted your edits so quickly, and I should have asked you about it first. If you're willing to hear my reasons for reverting, I hope that you can understand my actions a little better. Some of the things that you wrote about are also being disputed by the mediation participants, and in the mediation we are in the process of finding a compromise agreement that everyone can accept. Agreeing on a compromise version is a lot easier if the version in the article doesn't change while mediation is going on, so I reverted your edits to make life easier for myself and the other mediation parties. It wasn't really anything to do with the neutrality of your edits. If you are still interested in editing this article, I would like you to reconsider taking part in the mediation. The more users we have there who are interested in the article, the better the chance that the solution will be neutral, and the longer the result will stick. Please let me know if you have any questions about this - I'll be glad to answer them. All the best — Mr. Stradivarius 10:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)