Please drop me a line with comments or concerns below.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
Striking out comments
Don't be so dramatic, I don't recall that, but if I did, I'm sorry. I don't know what was I thinking (literally). I hope I didn't strike anything important.--T-man, the wise 05:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be marked in red if I did so? I don't get it. I mean, I could be. I do remember reading your comment already striked, but I don't remember doing it or having a purpose to do that. And there is the lack of red marking in the comparison page... I guess that will remain a scary mistery, hehe.--T-man, the wise 05:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Me and my sockpuppet
Hey man! I mean, hey myself! I must be speaking to myself, since T-man, that infinitely wise scarecrow says we are sock puppets: can you believe this crazy page he's created? One thing I don't get... how can we be the same person when you live in Utah and I live in Edmonton? Ciao man, or as they say in Mérida, ciao man. -- Dyslexic agnostic 23:44, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I can't believe it... you just proved that you can't be a sock puppet, and he still doesn't get it... enough to make you scream!!! At least wikipedia is never boring with the likes of T-Man around. -- Dyslexic agnostic 04:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- No! I went to see, but there is no decision re sock puppets yet! Where is it? -- Dyslexic agnostic 23:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nevermind... I now see the "unrelated" statement. All right! Good to know... I was starting to get confused... -- Dyslexic agnostic 23:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for understanding. Somehow my second part of the sentence ("If you revert, please notify me so that I don't unlink from your archives anymore.") wasn't added. I was currently cleaning up the petitionspot.com log, and removing as many as possible that were not used anymore to keep the list as small as possible to be able to catch spam faster. That log is fairly easy to check, but with others like invisionfree, things become harder. Anyways, thanks for understanding, and I won't be modifying your archives anymore. -- ReyBrujo 03:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Deleted GraalOnline article maliciously recreated secretly in german...
The GraalOnline article that was deleted due to WP:WEB, NPOV, and other issues noted in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GraalOnline has been secretly reposted at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graal_Online , with little to no changes except for the language translation... The English page was nearly unanimously voted for removal and barring any significant changes should not be allowed back in any language... Vipercat (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Utah Wikipedia Meetup
|Interested in attending a Utah Wikipedia Meetup?|
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)