User talk:Giltsbeach

Courtesy notification

I've started a section at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Information in infobox, not in article, again: Heraldic tinctures. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Serial Number 54129

Hello, Giltsbeach. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Message added 12:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SN54129 12:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yngvadottir (talk) 11:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This block is the result of the conversation at WP:ANI. You need to completely change your approach to editing if you want to return. Cullen328 (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Giltsbeach (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You guys are weird af. You really think people join Wikipedia to read policies and take part in months-long discussions about infobox guidelines? You seriously think that is normal? And it "scares you" that I rather just get to editing and improving the articles I care about rather than take part in your bureaucratic hellscape? You let an editor harass and troll me for a month, no one would help when I sought intervention, and then you blocked me in the dead of night because I dared to ask for help in the first place? Yeah, I'm good. You guys really did earn your reputation. Good luck.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Giltsbeach (talk) 02:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]