Jump to content

User talk:Gmattox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Customer experience. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Wieldthespade (talk) 06:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having received your message on my talk page, and having looked back at the deleted sandbox page, I think maybe you were not trying to promote anything. If you weren't, then a request for unblock may well be considered sympathetically. However, before considering restoring the deleted page, I would like to know where you got its contents. Did you write it yourself, or did you copy it from the sources you gave as references? JamesBWatson (talk) 14:54, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote the article myself and gave credit to the references that I researched and gave me the ideas. I realize that Wikipedia is not a term paper and will review the style in which I wrote. This is a first time submission for me and I think I need to review the content and be more factual than persuasive. Thanks, Gregg
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Gmattox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For a grad class at Bellevue University, I'm trying to improved the digital consumer experience with a Wikipedia article.

Accept reason:

Per JBW above. Well, you have learned how not to do it - now go sort it out... Never be afriad to ask - there's two admins here who answer questions, or the Teahouse WP:TEAHOUSE (don't let the name put you off...), or most of the regular editors too. Read WP:NPOV and WP:RS. Good luck. But don't link to your pages in the External Links - those are for outside stuff. Things in your user space should not be linked to. Peridon (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure your prof is aware of WP:SUP :-) I made a comment at James' page ... IMHO, the article you're working on does not appear to be a valid topic for a separate article. It's a content fork of a main topic: customer experience, and the details would be better served as a subsection of that article (✉→BWilkins←✎) 19:21, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Gmattox, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission has been declined

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

The article still reads as a personal essay/sales promotion pitch etc and not encyclopedic coverage of a topic.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:23, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As above, the article is a promotional pitch / "how to" and not coverage of what the subject is and how it is in the world, as described and covered by reliable third party sources. The external links section also needs heavey trimming to meet the external link guidelines -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:21, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible source of information for your Digital Consumer Experience article

[edit]

I found a source that you might be able to use for your article-in-progress. It's from the Journal of Healthcare Information Management. It may be more helpful for an article like Web accessibility but I believe it could perhaps serve as the foundation for a section about the intricacies of providing a flexible Digital Consumer Experience to various market segments. It's a huge huge PDF file, and only one section is about digital customer experience but the rest may be of use as well. The PDF is located here: [1] and the page you want is page 72.

I'd also be happy to help you restructure the article according to general Wiki standards. Have you considered adding a Digital Customer Experience section at User experience? Would this satisfy your class requirements or do you need a whole article? I'd be happy to help. --Wieldthespade (talk) 05:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Digital customer experience, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Wywin (talk|contribs) 21:33, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Digital customer experience

[edit]

Hello, Gmattox,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Digital customer experience should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital customer experience .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, -MJH (talk) 00:20, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digital Consumer Experience concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digital Consumer Experience, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digital Consumer Experience

[edit]

Hello Gmattox. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Digital Consumer Experience".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digital Consumer Experience}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gmattox&oldid=586796436"