User talk:GoldDolphin

June 2022

Hello, I'm Kpddg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ahilyabai Holkar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kpddg ^(talk) 16:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ahilyabai Holkar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Extorc.talk 17:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Professional Security Association (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I’m sorry, but the sourcing here isn’t helping the subject meet our General Notability Guidelines. Most of the citations here are primary sources or only mention the subject in passing. Also announcements don’t count towards notability (i.e. new project launches from International Professional Security Association).

We need *significant* in-depth coverage in notable media outlets or by notable publishers about International Professional Security Association. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about International Professional Security Association specifically; books or peer-reviewed white papers written ABOUT International Professional Security Association; television and radio features ABOUT International Professional Security Association.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it might not be the right time (WP:TOOSOON for International Professional Security Association to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Professional Security Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:International Professional Security Association, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 16:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GoldDolphin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 16:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

I have reversed this edit because you made it without any explanation or verification. Bjenks (talk) 23:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]