User talk:Goldenbluesoul

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Shezthz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leo Francis 92. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 08:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goldenbluesoul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Ravensfire: and @Girth Summit: @Ivanvector: @Ivanvector: @Girth Summit: @Spicy: @RoySmith: Please Re check again idont know Leo Francis 92,shethz,zedegzo 2.0 Please re check my IP adress dont do injustice with us even i not edited English wikipedia also.My recheck my ip please i beg you. Who said that that accounts are my first you check my IP adress then Block. In English wikipedia All are sasta Administrator's they blocking without any reason. Tell me what proof should I give to poove that I am not the owner of the above account. Please do all cross checks .you also check that i edited 1000+ in Hindi wikipedia and 600+ in Kannada wikipedia but you above mention accounts are not edited in that wikipedia Leo Francis 92 only edited English and marathi and zedgeoo 2.0 edited in English and Malayalam. i am diffrent person.Please you also check my email,my Ip also my device because i am not that person without any mistake dont block me Please.Goldenbluesoul (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is almost incoherent. Regardless, it does not address the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leo Francis 92. Additionally, I concur with the findings: Confirmed to Shezthz. Yamla (talk) 11:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ivanvector: @Ivanvector: @Girth Summit: @Spicy: @RoySmith: but how you confirmed that Shezthz is my account i am using only this account and i not Much edited This wikipedia also. I only know that i have only one account You should Improve Your Finding technologyes. If you think that Shezthz is also my account ok.I know that It is not easy to explain to Brithish Adminstration because They ruled our India but didn't hear anything there then here's what they'll hear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenbluesoul (talk • contribs)

I will not share the exact technical findings. It's very, very clear that both accounts are closely related to each other. You claiming there's no relationship is simply not factually accurate. And knock it off with the "Brithish Adminstration" nonsense. --Yamla (talk) 12:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector: @Ivanvector: @Girth Summit: @Spicy: @RoySmith: 😂 what's going on wikipedia they first blocked me as Sockpuppet of Leo Francis 92 and shethz and Now they blocked me as Sockpuppet of Syntaxerrors. As i already said in wikipedia blocking system is not good. Syntaxerrors is also not my account you check again. Becuase of some cheap Administrator's wikipedia will go to hell.wikipedia owner fined 8 lakh rupees and now they asking with us to pay money in wikipedia because of some cheap moderator's. they should Focus on Spam articles rather than blocking please re check my block Syntaxerrors is not my account. As i said Leo Francis 92 is not my account and Syntaxerrors is also not my account.You said "It's very, very clear that both accounts are closely related to each other" what happened now ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenbluesoul (talk • contribs) 2:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #73239

is closed. Checkuser block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #81299 is closed.

One of the things that terrifies me is a possible member of an undeclared paid editor ring getting admin rights. Last time I said email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org. Unblocking you here so you can get admin rights on HIWIKI is not a reason to unblock you. Courtesy ping @Girth Summit:

एक बात जो मुझे डराती है वह है एक अज्ञात भुगतान संपादक समूह के संभावित सदस्य को व्यवस्थापक अधिकार मिलना। पिछली बार मैंने मध्यस्थता समिति को arbcom-en@wikimedia.org पर ईमेल करने के लिए कहा था। यहां आपको अनब्लॉक करना ताकि आप HIWIKI पर व्यवस्थापक अधिकार प्राप्त कर सकें, आपको अनब्लॉक करने का कोई कारण नहीं है। -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: i am not a paid editor. and arbcom-enwikimedia.org also not responding and Leo Francis 92 is not my account. U experienced administrator also not able to find difference between me and Leo Francis 92?. and some administrator acting like wikipedia is their ______s property.thanks for your reply.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenbluesoul (talk • contribs) 07:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We'll see what happens next. Only a check user (including the ArbCom) may unblock one who is blocked by a check user.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:41, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk-page blanking

Removal of declined unblocks while the block is in place and any other attendant discussion is not allowed. Do you really think being disruptive here, in a discussion you really really want to end well for you, is going to end well for you? As an admin (not a CU) I object to unblocking here for ongoing disruption here. If that blocks adminship somewhere else, well that's how it goes. DMacks (talk) 17:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I'm not British, so . . . . . -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:13, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No more discussions in this page. Don't distrub me. I apologise for my mistake (for the word British).Sorry

And you blanked it again. So I'm revoking your talk-page permission as well. DMacks (talk) 04:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.