User talk:Gooc99x x

December 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that in this edit to Elam, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Oud, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Musical instrument, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tanbur. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 18:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 18:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]