User talk:GrandLucky

Welcome!

Hello, GrandLucky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – Muboshgu (talk) 20:02, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't start your career out here like this. Do not add WP:PUFFERY to articles. The picture itself says more than the words you would normally use. We do not engage in editorializing the way that you are. Please undo your edit and read up on some of what we do here. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could we get you to read up on WP:PROVEIT. What we are looking for is sources where statements appear. ... this is so readers don't have to run around to article after article finding research material.--Moxy 🍁 04:07, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you reply to the concerns raised here...dont get blocked simply because your not aware of the norms here. Best be aware of WP:3RR related to WP:Editwar.--Moxy 🍁 04:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

...

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Moxy 🍁 04:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning regarding edit warning and the 3 revert rule

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. El_C 04:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing as well as a violation of the 3 revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 05:03, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]