User talk:GrawLIN

Welcome!

Hello, GrawLIN, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of Telecaster players did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Spike Wilbury (talk) 21:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Your recent editing history at All I Wanna Do (The Beach Boys song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.ili (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Notcharizard. I noticed that in this edit to Borstal, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Russell Brand, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 23:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding adding Russel Brand doing Wim Hof method work to the article... besides your link being improperly formatted and throwing an error into the article, your reference is Brand's YouTube channel. That would make that a WP:PRIMARY source, which is insufficient sourcing. We'd need something besides Brand's YouTube channel as a source for that. Le Marteau (talk) 23:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Elliott Smith. FMSky (talk) 17:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]