Jump to content

User talk:Greg Bosher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Greg Bosher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 00:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Bad Intentions (album), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:43, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Merry Christmas (Mariah Carey album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:19, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to music-related articles such as Rock with U were reverted for the reasons stated in the above messages. While anyone can contribute to Wikipedia, editors must have a grasp on enyclopedic guidelines to ensure that all contributions are constructive and add to the quality of articles. Genre warrior edits, mass/frequent changes and focus to genres in music articles, are disruptive and run contrary to the verifiablity policy, which says that all content must be attributed to a reliable, published source so that readers are ensured this isnt the opinion or imagination of the editor(s) (WP:V). Please keep this in mind when making future edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at I Look to You (song), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 07:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Can't Take Me Home, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you stop your changes to genres in articles without providing a reliable source. Genre-warring is undesirable and users who persistently do it end up blocked, you've been warned five times, six with this comment. If you continue change genres basing upon your points of view, as you did at Mya and Friends Presents... Best of Both Worlds, your account will be reported to any administrator. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for continually changing the genres of music pages without any sources. Several people have asked you here to stop, but since you persisted, I had to block you. After your block, please go to the article talk pages and discuss your suggsted changes, and be sure to have sources to support your ideas. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Say It Right, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Widr (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continuing your genre warring after your account was unblocked. Note that if you resume the behavior again, I am very likely to block you indefinitely next time. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at The Female Boss, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for continued genre warring. This is your last chance. After the block is up, you need to discuss the matter on the article talk page. You need to give reliable sources. You can't just say "I listened to the album so I know what genres it is." If you edit war over this topic again, your next block will be indefinite. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Qwyrxian (talk) 23:48, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]