User talk:Gwmiller23

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Exposome.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 19:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Exposome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nimuaq (talk) 15:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exposome, a thank you[edit]

Just a note from me to say Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for this article on a valuable topic and for persevering in the face of Wikipedia's sometimes labyrinthine ways. It takes a while to get used to the style used here. I did a fair amount of copyediting on the article before and after it was moved in mainspace. Probably just looking at my edit summaries and the kinds of changes I made, will give you an idea of how to go about writing our next one, or expanding this one. I also wanted to let you know about another resource here—Wikipedia's Teahouse. It's a place providing great support for new editors. You can ask questions (no question is too basic) and get helpful answers and advice from experienced editors. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 17:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ToxSci Cover Feb 2014.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ToxSci Cover Feb 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]