User talk:HLwiKi

Reverted your edit to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-Scholes. The prize was given to Robert C. Merton *and* Myron Scholes.

Active user verification

Hello, HLwiKi. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:WPNN, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on WP:WPNN. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Diez2 03:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

Hey HLwiKi; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. I haven't had much chance to use the tool lately, but it looks really cool. Good luck with the new feature rollout! —HLwiKi (talk) 00:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The blanking of "Database"

I noticed your accidental blanking of database in recent changes, and it gave me quite a fright. After I did some snooping, it began to look like a plausibly legitimate operation, so instead of reverting it, I came here to leave a long-winded message to the effect of "if we merge the articles, the merged copy should sit at 'database', because that's where people will look." Then I noticed you reverted it. Well anyway, I thought this was a funny story. I'm a bit of a green editor, so for future reference, when I see something like this, should I just revert it myself? Thanks! —HLwiKi (talk) 01:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I had an edit conflict with a bot, and in the middle of resolving that instead of blanking just the History section, I accidentally blanked the whole thing. Given that it's presumably a relatively high-profile article, I certainly would have hoped that someone would have noticed that most of the content of Database had not made it into DBMS, reverted, and left me a polite but strongly worded message on my talk page. 8) I agree with your intuition that content should be on the Database article and not DBMS. In fact, I'm going to move the History section there and put the "See" on the DBMS article's History section instead. But, I'm giving it some cleanup first and I thought this way the diffs in the version history would be easier to read and understand. Anyway, thanks for looking into that disappearance, and sorry for the false alarm! -- Beland (talk) 01:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Thanks for the advice! —HLwiKi (talk · contribs) 01:58, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, and yeah, replying on my talk page was fine. I'm weird and like to move stuff back and forth and delete dealt-with messages. 8) -- Beland (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comments to a friendly Wikian

Hi there, thanks for Editing Google Keep...nice to meet you...btw, would like to connect if you want...leave me a comment how that might work...thanks Sam Samdelux (talk) 23:18, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Sustainability

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sustainability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Eurofighter Typhoon

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Eurofighter Typhoon. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Cough medicine

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cough medicine. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Julian day

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julian day. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HLwiKi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:BMW

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HLwiKi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]