User talk:Happiness2018

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Happiness2018, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Louise Glover has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Louise Glover was changed by Happiness2018 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936552 on 2018-02-15T23:11:28+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Louise Glover. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Louise Glover, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the WP:NPOV policy. Wikipedia articles present both sides of subjects, good and bad. We do not omit material just because it is unfavourable; we certainly don't remove material because the subject's feelings are allegedly hurt by it being included. —C.Fred (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Louise Glover. The material in the article is backed up with citations to reliable sources. If you think the material is incorrect, you need to discuss the matter at Talk:Louise Glover and provide sources of equal or better reliability that show the corrected information. —C.Fred (talk) 00:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Louise Glover. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The claims you made in this edit summary suggest that you have a conflict of interest with Glover. Accordingly, you should not edit the article at all after your block expires. You may request changes at Talk:Louise Glover, but you need to justify your suggestions per Wikipedia policy and by providing published, reliable secondary sources. —C.Fred (talk) 00:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]