User talk:Hdps8

This is Hdps8's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nirvana Reunion (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mach61 were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Nirvana_(band)#2006–present:_Further_reissues_and_reunions instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nirvana Reunion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HWDPiS! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mach61 (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonah Nimoy (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

These are not reliable sources and the subject's notability is not evident from them.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonah Nimoy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 15:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Białystok dialect

Hello, HWDPiS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Białystok dialect, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nirvana Reunion

Hello, HWDPiS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nirvana Reunion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kamil Kasperczak moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kamil Kasperczak. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 19:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonah Nimoy

Hello, Hdps8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonah Nimoy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Renzo Angles

Hello, Hdps8,

Thank you for creating Renzo Angles.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There is not enough here to pass the notability criteria

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 09:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Hdps8. Thank you for your work on Renzo Angles. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is not enough proof of notability, it is too soon

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 09:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renzo Angles moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Renzo Angles. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and he has made a good start, but it is too early. He is not as yet notable. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 09:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round-tripping

Howdy! Thanks for writing Round-tripping (computer science). Do you think it would make sense to merge Round-trip format conversion into it so that they're one article? I'm not sure there need to be two. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 03:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Round-tripping (computer science) article is more general than Round-trip format conversion. So I suggest to move important fragments to my article. BTW, the Round-trip format conversion article is quite old and information is outdated. Hdps8 (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]