User talk:Healthycare

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Ascorbic acid do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I hope we will both be able to make Wikipedia a better resource. Healthycare (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to drop me your comments on my edits. Thank you. Healthycare (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. The section you added to Medical uses of silver has substantially duplicated material already included in other sections of the article. Would you perhaps be prepared to go a bit further, consolidating all related material in one place and eliminating duplications? Wdford (talk) 09:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've noticed the "Biological effects of silver" section has covered argyria and some other common health problems arising from the excessive colloidal silver consumption, but I thought could be a good idea to put a few common words in a separate section. Now I think that I can add to this section and rename it to "Biological effects and risks of silver" or something like that. Healthycare (talk) 09:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MEDRS

If you haven't already discovered, information concerning health claims should follow WP:MEDRS. --Ronz (talk) 15:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Healthycare. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback.
Message added 18:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ukexpat (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of L-Arginine Malate

I have nominated L-Arginine Malate, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L-Arginine Malate. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Them From Space 08:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I have nominated every article you created for deletion as a batch nomination. The link to the debate is still the same as I posted above. Them From Space

- Comment Not sure about your actions as I actually believe you haven't read any of the articles created and haven't looked through the references used for the articles creation. These are the facts :

These are all worthy encyclopedia subjects having good reliable and verifiable sources.
These are not about obscure or non-consumer businesses or products.
They are all reasonably neutral in tone...if you think something needs to be changed, then change it.
They are not copywrited content, all having its originality. J.D. (talk) 09:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Copper L-aspartate for deletion

The article Copper L-aspartate is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copper L-aspartate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!