User talk:Heliocybe

Fungus

Hello, I noted your comment on the Fungus image - as you appear to be a well-versed fun-gi (sorry) I was wondering if you might be able to identify the species of this pretty fungus, currently growing on a rotten stump in Cheshire, England? Regards --Joopercoopers (talk) 18:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These look like Trametes versicolor.Heliocybe (talk) 21:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great, many thanks. --Joopercoopers (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

[1] - discussion regards the use of external links in corn smut. Thanks, WLU (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're on Carling? Cool, we're in the same city - off the experimental farm I'd guess. How did it end up with DAOM? Departement Agricultural Osomething Mycologie? Do you know a short redheaded lady who teachs aikido? WLU (talk) 20:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, checking your contribs you're rather irregular - I'd normally wait until you've a chance to reply before removing the links again, but that could be a while. I'm re-removing them but please let us discuss if you think one or more are still appropriate. I'm neglecting my watchlist these days, so please be so kind as to use my talk page or e-mail to alert me. Thanks, WLU (talk) 20:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

My apologies, I feel I owe an explanation for my most recent edit (replacing this template). I was checking your contribs to see if you've received my message and clicked the diff. Note that the template ({{feeding}}) contains a link to carnivorous fungus. Since the page is contained in the template, it should be placed at the bottom of all pages that the template contains. You had labelled it as an external link - it's not, external links are to external pages while navigation template links only to internal pages. They should go in the EL section (more accurately at the bottom of the page, and the manual of style puts the EL section there), and I would say this one is quite appropriate, as the template is built. If you really think the template is inappropriate on the page, I would suggest that you discuss removing carnivorous fungus from the template itself with contributors who helped build it (based on its history, the relevant person is probably User:Anxietycello). He's also got a question posted on Template_talk:Feeding that as an expert you might be able to reply to. The template is quite new, as is Anxietycello (~140 contributions), so I'm certain there's room to discuss. Thanks, please let me know if I can be of assistance. WLU (talk) 14:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your very courteous note on my talk page, much appreciated. Wikipedia's not going away, so whenever you've the time to discuss I am at your service (subject to the same restrictions on time in my own life). Thanks! WLU (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Psathyrella

Hi, no need to be sorry about your changes - I'm not an expert, just trying to figure this stuff out (fungal taxonomy) as I go along. I'm ordering the 10th edition today! Cheers Sasata (talk) 15:43, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clitocybe clavipes

Hello, I hadn't realised you (as in article author on this species' new name) were an editor here, so welcome :)

I thought this would be a fascinating species to write about..wasn't it the original type species for Clitocybe? Anyway, I was wondering on the acceptance of the new genus name, was the consensus fairly global? Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:50, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks for the messages. There was no original type species (holotype) for Clitocybe. The first lectotypification seems to have been A. nebularis, however that is controversial also. I'll send a copy of my article. As for consensus in acceptance of Ampulloclitocybe, old habits are hard to break and the clitocyboid fungi are largely unsequenced, but for anyone using molecular data, Ampulloclitocybe has stuck and continually is supported. At one point I was going to go edit more agaric generic names on Wikipedia but simply have not had time. Eventually I will do so. Heliocybe (talk) 15:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please! Buffing up Clitocybe to at least reflect a bit better on current state-of-play-taxonomically would be good :) Any Reliable Sources call it a wastebasket taxon ? Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redheadia

That is so cool to have a genus named after you :) Sasata (talk) 04:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mushrooms protection

You're welcome, it kept popping up in my watchlist too. The protection runs out 4 December, you can let me know if the problem comes back then if I am not still watching it, or you can post at Requests for page protection. SpinningSpark 12:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tricholomataceae

Hi Heliocybe, I was wondering if you might be able to help me. I'm working on an article List of Tricholomataceae genera. The Dictionary of the Fungi (10th ed) claims there are 78 genera in the family, I've only been able to come up with 68. Do you know of a recent source that might have the full listing of genera? I suppose I could find them by going through every page in the Dictionary... but I'd rather avoid that method :) Sasata (talk) 17:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Having poked around some more I think I'm probably missing a number of anamorphic genera. I noticed that Asterophora (and the anamorph Ugola) are listed here as in the Tricholomataceae, but are Lyophyllaceae in the Dictionary... Interestingly, Fungal Families of the World (2007) does not list Lyophyllaceae... very confusing! Sasata (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mycology workshop

Hello, Heliocybe. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

-- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 19:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Pogonoloma, Heliocybe!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

While I'm sure you're an expert and can understand the fungal nomenclature, please see WP:NOTJARGON (#7 & #8) and WP:MTAU for tips on tailoring Wikipedia articles to the average reader, not solely mycologists. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Atractosporocybe) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Atractosporocybe, Heliocybe!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Is the new genus monotypic? if so A. inornata should probably be discussed in the genus article.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Heliocybe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Heliocybe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Agroathelia rolfsii a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 16:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. I was unaware of how to do that properly Heliocybe (talk) 17:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agroathelia rolfsii, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Athelia and Corticium. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]