User talk:Hello mister how do you do

December 2006

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Sonakshi Sinha; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 18:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rashmi Sharma Telefilms

[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]

September 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Gui de to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. Dougweller (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hello mister how do you do (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I am blocked. I promise you I will never vandalize Wikipedia again. If you want to test then unblock me for two days and if I vandalize Wikipedia a single time you can block me indefinitely. Hello mister how do you do (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hello mister how do you do (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry for vandalizing Wikipedia. You may be familiar with the philosophy 'Assume good faith'. Assume good faith with me too and I promise you I will never vandalize Wikipedia even in my dreams.

Decline reason:

Assuming good faith is what we do until someone, like you did, proves that they are not acting in good faith.You were told how to proceed in the previous decline, here it is again since you apparently missed it: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Noting your offer on your first unblock request, you are already blocked indefinitely; we need a good reason to modify this block. It is clear that you have edited here before you created this account; are you prepared to reveal the account name you have used previously? In view of the fact that all of your edits on this account were vandalisms, I am not convinced that your intention is to contribute constructively, but I can be persuaded. If unblocked, what do you intend to write about?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to contribute for films and television, biographies, notable songs and devices Hello mister how do you do (talk) 14:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]