User talk:HemperorOfSmokeLandVillez.dum

Wecome to Wiki. Quit vandalizing the Bourke Engine page. First warning. Greglocock 10:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bro

Hey bro how ya doing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.24.31.152 (talk) 14:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How am I doing ??? That iz a trick question ..... depend'z on what I am doing and who you ask. Understand ??? HaHaHa, NOT. I'm alive, so PRETTY-GOOD sooo far ....... Daddy still help'$ me $ave money

Wikipedia:Scientific peer review/Bourke engine

This review ended long ago. See the tag on Talk:Bourke engine. There is no point in adding anything to it. --Bduke (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you nicely. The review was archived on July 29th. I have reverted it back to the last version before it was archived and have protected the page so only admins can edit it. Please follow our guidelines. --Bduke (talk) 22:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hookah

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Hookah. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 15:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Your vandalism of my userpage waz becau$e of GregLoCock VANDALIZING Russell Bourke'z life undle$$ly, WHY ??? The TRUTH hurt'z that much ??? KNOW YOUR CHEMISTRY , when his small port's were complained about, Russell Bourke said that you/we do NOT need larger exhaust port's or larger exhaust valves for higher RPM because he give's his engine three thing's and only two go out the exhaust. Know the chemistry . Prohibition was NOT to get rid of the DRUNK'z ..... ju$t the ALCOHOL FUEL. German World War 2 Tank'$ used potato alcohol fuel. Henry Ford said in 1925, look at Hempology.orgyFun , and see that he said one acre of potato's will give U$ ONE HUNDRED gallon'$ of alcohol fuel for the potato cultivator that uses ONE GALLON PER ACRE. Only 99_gallon'$ of VODKA-Juice per acre ??? Heard of BRAZIL, lately ??? Friday 1-04-2008AfterDope, not BeforeCannabi$ in OUR LifeAfterTheOilCrash.netrickestika we ALL need Hemp4Fuel.dumy becau$e the $un and DIRT allow U$ to burn and BREAK-EVEN with NO LO$$ .... the OilySandWitch'$ from Texa$ really $icken me in ME, U$, who ??? U$ ??? Only 1,000,000,000 or Billion of u$ 6,500,000,000 or 6.5 Billion people have a ga$-hog Kar .... where '$ MY bicycle ??? In the jungle or swamp or up on MOUNTAIN ??? Don't live in a $wamp and complain about the mo$quito'$ ..... make mo$quito $tew .... drive fa$t and $crape wind$hield and invent $olar-$tew with $olar-Ice_Cube$ .... I wi$h the guy who invented the cancer-killing ice-cube'$ wa$n't killed ...... but drinking water help'$ prevent cancer and ma$terbation help'$ fight cancer ..... I LOVE fighting CANCER with my Hitachi-Magic-Wand.dumy thank'$ to Nikola Tesla'z lod.orgyFun and DrugStore.dumy with FREE $hipping over $26 ....... enjoy the GIFT of LIFE that ha$ been given to U$ a$ a TE$T ....

You have exactly 24 hours to revert all of those changes, otherwise I will leave it to the admins to sort you out. I rarely bring third partys into a dispute, but you bore me. Final warning. I may ring Roger on Monday. Will you pay for the call? Greglocock (talk) 00:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well Jack Herer, luckily for you somebody else reverted your vandalism, saving me the bother. I'd imagine your rather fragile hold on reality will make you think this is a victory. Wrong. Greglocock (talk) 07:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read 1938 Popular Mechanic's at http://www.JackHerer.com , Mizz Greg'zLowe$tCocker

I have decided against phoning Roger since (a) the phone number you gave is not commonly available, and (b) I have only your word that he is expecting me to call. Forgive me for saying this but I have no reason to trust you, based on your past behaviour. Greglocock (talk) 08:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I bore you ??? With TRUTH ??? Iz my 24 hour'z up yet ???

RR'z phone# ain't commonly available to you ??? What if it were you daughter's ???

You have NO rea$on to tru$t me ??? I prove Russell Bourke RIGHT TOOO OFTEN ???

As I said above "I'd imagine your rather fragile hold on reality will make you think this is a victory. Wrong. " Greg Locock (talk) 04:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

huh ??? Victory ??? Think-WRONG ??? That'$ me ....... And GregLowCocker SUCK'z 'em

wanna PoGo Stick ??? it's at http://www.ButtMachines.com but I'm a http://www.FuckingMachines.com person who know's http://www.KensTwistedMind.com

Official Notification

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

This is in regard to Greglocock and Oxymoron83's talk pages.

Bourke vandalism again BECAU$E GregLoCock won't allow Russell Bourke's TRUTH to be "typed"

Look sunshine, I am trying to work with you but your behavior makes this very hard. The rules (not my rules, THE rules) are that every statement that makes a claim needs to be backed up by a reference. Deleting references, and the reflist marker, completely destroys the intent behind that rule. In two weeks I am going to massively re-edit that article and delete all the unreferenced nonsense (all the stuff that says citation needed). You have a lot of work to do and insulting me is is not going to help.

You should read Wikipedia:Five pillars

Greg Locock (talk) 23:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

huh ??? HELP YOU ??? Ruin Russell Bourke's work ???

SunShine ??? Remember, me NumNut'z according to you. Niquette iz a "reference" to what ???

I in$ult you ??? HOW ??? By expo$ing TRUTH ??? Blame my memory of reading Russell Bourke's BOOK and talking to a sucessful #001 Bourke-Cycle-Engine vet, if you want. You threaten to change this site again ??? HOW ??? Will you use Russell Bourke's claim's ??? He never made Nitrous DiOxide like YOU SAID ENDLE$$LY OVER AND OVER, mizz liar king

I will re-edit the article once your medication has kicked in. Greg Locock (talk) 04:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Medication ??? THC fight'z CANCER, like it or NOT. Why you TWI$TING the "truth" so wrongly ??? Do you get paid enough ??? Read 1938 Popular Mechanic's at http://www.JackHerer.com yet ??? Dynamite to Cellophane ??? Henry Ford's UnBreakable Hempen-Plastic Car at http://www.Hempology.org or http://www.HempCar.org ??? Watch ALL 13plus minutes of USDA 1942 World War 2 movie "Hemp for Victory on http://www.YouTube.com , yet ??? Want http://www.Hemp4Fuel.com or $100,000.00 ??? But it makes me hungry + thirsty and it MAKE's me NOT WANT TO KILL

1938 Popular Mechanics

A tag has been placed on 1938 Popular Mechanics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 21:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 21:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 1938 Popular Mechanics

A tag has been placed on 1938 Popular Mechanics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 22:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC) ? ? ?? ??????? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ????? ????? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ?????Thank'z for waking me in ME UP ...... I'll TYPE in the WHOLE Febuary 1938 Popular Mechanics "New Billion Dollar Crop" at http://www.jackherer.com/popmech.html and then you can $ue me for being TRUE .......[reply]

Vandalism

Please don't vandalize people's pages when they recommend an SD on one of your articles. It's really not productive. Bagheera (talk) 22:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with 1938 Popular Mechanics, you will be blocked from editing. now deleted twice by two different administrators DGG (talk) 22:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Asthma cigarette

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Asthma cigarette. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Febuary 1938 Popular Mechanic's

A tag has been placed on Febuary 1938 Popular Mechanic's, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildthing61476 (talk) 20:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bourke engine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. HalfShadow (talk) 01:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, dude

Can I ask you just to chill awhile, cos others are having problems dealing with your edits. The other is that you'll get blocked, which isn't cool. All you need to do is lay off the advertising links, get used to the straight culture here, rap with the guys & do it their way. Talk is good here. On behalf of the Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers, chill. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 01:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Word. — Satori Son 02:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for You've been blocked for edit warring and arguing via edit summaries. Please reconsider your strategy for editing productively.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acroterion _(talk) 02:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please tone it down

You're acting like a bit of a fanatic with edits like this one. You can't seriously think it's helpful to add {{cn}} after every word. Friday (talk) 15:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop adding citation tags all over the place, and repetitive text in every sub-paragraph? This would be difficult for a reader to read comfortably and is becoming disruptive. Please feel free to make your point, with sources of course, but not at the expense of a readable article. I have reverted your changes to give you a further chance at contributing to an article written in the style of an encyclopedia. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 17:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Vandalising the page of a user who disagrees with you, as you did here, is not going to help your case. Please do not do it again, and please stop editing contentiously and disruptively. If you would like to address issues about an article, take it to the talk article. Continued disruption may be met with a block. - Revolving Bugbear 17:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

z z z x z y

To ALL Three ABOVE - huh ??? The TRUTH HURT'z ???

z I can't even MAKE my Great Uncle Russell Bourke's Bourke-Cycle-Engine engine design be NOT Twi$ted by GregLoCock or GregyLowestCockeri$ta wierd WRONG "true-fact'z". Clean and UnCommonly Cool exhaust of Carbon-DiOxide and water VAPOR was po$ted a$ Nitrous DiOxide and "water". NO vapor information supplied. Supp_LIED ..... but, I eventually argued the TRUTH from Russell Bourke's MOUTH and HisStory on PAPER into GregyLoCock'z "mind", maybe not, BUT .... I got him to finally ALLOW the TRUTH onto the electrical trick-FULL-o-LIE'z called WikkiPedia.dum ..... now if you read thi$ far, look at http://www.JackHerer.com/PopMech.html and READ it .... for GOODne$$'z Children called U$ ...... don't forget to watch AND li$ten to ALL 13plus minute'z of USDA 1942 WW2 movie "Hemp for Victory" on www.YouTube.com .... ever see a Dual Drive Sherman Tank floating in the OCEAN as a HempenCanvas Float-Boat, yet ??? It AIN'T Nylon and it'z 3,000% percent profit-ratio ..... http://www.Hemp4Fuel.com www.Hempology.org www.HempCar.org http://www.LifeAfterTheOilCrash.net say'z DEAL with Reality or Reality will Deal with YOU .... but Henry Ford's car he GREW from the DIRT had a fender he could DENT or SCRATCH with a SledgeHAMMER .... watch his 1941 tv commercial about his UnBreakable HempenPlastic Car ... if YOU DARE. DARE ??? DARE to tell the TRUTH about HEMP ??? Columbus's CANVAS ??? Hemp supplied 85% of ALL mechanical OIL in 1925, so .... tax it $100 per Ounce or $1,600 per Pound .... they'll NEVER know "Marihuana" is from Columbus's CANVAS. Yet ??? Oh, you NEED the Marihuana TAX $tamp to NOT PAY tho$e price'$ .... gotta BREAK the Fifth Amendment to OUR non-existant Con$titution. You know, incriminate yourself. Thank-You Timothy Leary. Gotta have plant to get $tamp ??? Gotta get $tamp to have plant ??? huh ??? I Plead the Fifth, the WHOLE Fifth and nothing but the Fifth ..... be it Whiskey, Rum or Vodka..... unle$$ you only have half-gallon'z .... I like tho$e TOOO HicUp Burp The TRUTH HURT'$ U$ ALL , Enjoy .....

Your continual disparagement of me, and my name, in edit summaries and here is noted. You'd better start adding some good references to that article or a lot of your ridiculous assertions will be edited out. You have one week, approximately. Incidentally please stop altering the menaing of statements that are backed up by references. I shall revert all such on sight, there is no excuse for it.Greg Locock (talk) 22:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

______________________________________________________________________________________________ z Oh Greggy, YOU should NOI compare Russell Bourke's TRUE PROVEN WORK to "different" design'z that have NOTHING to do with the Bourke-Cycle-Engine and it's engine design. KNOW YOUR CHEMISTRY. Are JUST trying to LIE and TWIST people'z mind on PURPOSE or because YOUR BO$$ Say'z to ???? Huh ??? BE REAL MR or Mizz Nitrous-DiOxide LOVER ..... rememebr ??? How did YOU "learn" the DIFFERENCE between Carbon-DiOxide and Nitrous-DiOxide ??? Lord Allah GOODness iz in U$ ALL, so remember that. When GOODness made man, SHE made a MissTake ..... I enjoy MissTake'z when ever I can. Call me an animal. When in doubt, remember http://www.Hitachi-Magic-Wand.com and thank Nikola Tesla again .... Edi$on WHO ???

If you're going to continue to edit here, you're going to have to change your approach. This spouting of gibberish is not at all helpful to collaboration. If you edit disruptively, you may be blocked from editing again. Friday (talk) 22:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked for disruptive editing recently; please edit constructively (I'm sure you know the rules), or your editing privileges may be suspended. Acroterion _(talk) 22:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to STOP GregLoCock from THINKING he I$ BO$$ of Ru$$ell Bourke ??? He claimed Nitrous DiOxide was made until I got him to LEARN what Russell Bourke has had in his Bourke Engine Documentary for 35 YEAR'z .

Try editing as if you wished to be taken seriously. Also, please stop with the hemp spam. Acroterion _(talk) 23:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked you from editing, indefinitely this time. I have no confidence that you can be a positive contributor, and I see no reason to believe you're even trying. Friday (talk) 00:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/HemperorOfSmokeLandVillez.dum for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.--WebHamster 18:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]