User talk:Henrydonald

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Glossary of rowing terms, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - David Biddulph (talk) 10:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The House of Blue Leaves (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The House of Blue Leaves (film) was changed by Henrydonald (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917534 on 2011-12-14T01:17:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kuala Mount Park, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kuala Mount Park was changed by Henrydonald (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979884 on 2011-12-14T01:23:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Schist, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mikenorton (talk) 22:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mahé Drysdale. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mikenorton (talk) 22:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Golliwogg, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Golliwogg was changed by Henrydonald (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854115 on 2012-03-01T02:24:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 02:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Henrydonald (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Henrydonald (talk) 00:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason provided, and all of your edits are garbage. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.