User talk:Hintss/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hintss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I still can't edit because my IP was blocked by an expiring autoblock on my IP when my account was blocked. See my second talk archive near the bottom.

Decline reason:

Please fallow the directions here — Tiptoety ^talk 01:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Wikiproject Wikiteam

Wikipedia:Wikiproject Wikiteam, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikiproject Wikiteam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Wikiproject Wikiteam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 12:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/December 2008#hintss. SoxBot X (talk) 14:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Be careful

[1] is my edit to my own talk page. Though if this guy gets any more annoying I'll start blanking him :D Thanks for the good faith revert though :) Merry Christmas Mattie^TK 00:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Your edits

You need to be more careful with your edits. You have reverted me twice, once when I was leaving a vandalism warning to an ip, here and once I when I left another comment on the talk page of another user (here). Please take more care with your reversions. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:55, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Bot requests

Stop making duplicate bot requests of denied tasks, it is disruptive. BJ^Talk 02:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

turning numbers into numerical values

Please don't do this, especially for numbers one through ten. It goes against pretty much every known guide to English language writing style. I've reverted your edits. --Versageek 03:07, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Corrections

A couple small things you might have overlooked:

1. While fixing grammar is commendable in articles, it's actually requested that we not fix the spelling and grammar mistakes of others on pages in the "Talk" namespaces and on any other page where users leave signed commentary of some sort, most typically on Wikipedia: and Template: pages of various sorts. While content pages should be as close to perfect as possible, "fixing" someone else's comments is quite literally changing what they've said: While many users won't care, there's quite a few that will, so it's best practice to simply not do so.
2. It's spelled "grammar" not "grammer", you may wish to fix your script. :) Kylu (talk) 03:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

• I also noticed "a unique" being changed to "an unique" (here) - you might want to add exceptions to your script, or some form of human double-checking. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 13:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't using a script, but a bot. I was watching the semi-automated edits. Must've overlooked that edit then.