User talk:Hl5250d

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hl5250d (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, so just take my word for it... AND THEN if any vandalism comes from this IP, you can undo it AND block me. Hl5250d (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We'd rather not take our chances. And another chance we're not going to take is reading yet another one of these unblock requests. Talk page access to be revoked. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2012

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Bonn International School because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry but the content isn't reliable as per policies relating to verifiability. This is 'not a Blog, or a reviews page, unfortunately, I will have to remove the content you added. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bonn International School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bonn International School was changed by Hl5250d (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931758 on 2012-09-09T13:04:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bonn International School, you may be blocked from editing. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/User:Hl5250dn for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bonn International School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please do not blank pages like what you did. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Salvio

^{Let's talk about it!} 15:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hl5250d (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My brother did this in full knowledge that it would take away editing rights from our IP address. You can rest assured that his computer activity will be monitored from now on. I don't intend on editing articles a lot, but I would like to be able to have the option, for if I ever need to. Thank you. Hl5250d (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request is nonsensical; the one person who made this account's edits is the person who is blocked. If a different person is now logged in with this user's account- please log off at once. This is your brother's account, and you are not permitted to use it. If an autoblock from this block is affecting you, request unblock on your own registered account. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hl5250d (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You misunderstand... My account was HL5250DN. I left it logged in, then my brother got me banned and then my he made (I think) a number of accounts thats' usernames were derivatives of mine and got my entire IP address banned. I'm not sure exactly how much of what I know is the truth, but please unblock me and then if you see further examples of vandalism from this IP address, block it again. Thank you. Hl5250d (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, then your brother has ruined your Wikipedia career. Max Semenik (talk) 16:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hl5250d (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry, but I do not find that remotely funny. Please unblock me and then if anything happens, block me again. What's the worst that could happen? Hl5250d (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are responsible for your account's edits; your account vandalized, and so it is blocked. Those few edits which do not qualify as vandalism do not appear constructive either. Further, by your admission, your account has been compromised, and for security and copyright reasons must remain blocked permanently. While the essay linked in the previous decline is written in a humorous manner, that is because "it was my little brother" is an extremely common appeal reason, and one that is never accepted for those reasons. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:06, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hl5250d (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, that last decline made sense... So yes, I agree, this account has been compromised, so has my original account HL5250DN, so by all means, keep this account blocked, the other one too, but please unblock this general IP address. Thank you. Hl5250d (talk) 17:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

For all of the reasons detailed in previous declined requests. You have stated that your brother has had access to your account; it is therefore compromised and will not, ever, be unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Which we're also not going to do, because a) your brother retains access to your IP address, and according to you has a propensity for creating sockpuppets, and b) we have no way of telling whose hands were on the keyboard then, or even if you have a little brother. For all we know (and this is covered in the essay you didn't find funny) you're making him up and did all that yourself. Blocks are meant to prevent disruption to Wikipedia; lifting these would only enable it. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hl5250d (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admins, I understand that my account will NEVER be unblocked, but I'm asking you to please unblock the IP address. Thank you. Hl5250d (talk) 17:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no need; there's been nothing but vandalism from this IP. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.